On 06/13/2008 3:45 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Here is an early version of the Jingle-streams spec:
>
> http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-streams.html
>
> Next I'll copy the e2e-streams stuff from XEP-0174 into a new spec.
http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/e2e-streams.html
Pete
On 06/13/2008 3:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 06/13/2008 3:12 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
>> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> 1. We modify XEP-0174 so it just defines _presence._tcp as a discovery
>>> mechanism, as a result of which you have an IP address and port that you
>>> can use for a direct TCP
On 06/13/2008 3:12 PM, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> 1. We modify XEP-0174 so it just defines _presence._tcp as a discovery
>> mechanism, as a result of which you have an IP address and port that you
>> can use for a direct TCP connection that functions as a transport for an
>> e2
Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> 1. We modify XEP-0174 so it just defines _presence._tcp as a discovery
> mechanism, as a result of which you have an IP address and port that you
> can use for a direct TCP connection that functions as a transport for an
> e2e XML stream.
>
> 2. We split the e2e XML strea
On 06/13/2008 1:10 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 06/09/2008 11:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 06/09/2008 9:50 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>
>>> However, I got talking to Rob McQueen - there's a certain amount of
>>> sense in, instead of describing this in terms of IBB, describing it in
>>>
On 06/09/2008 11:09 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 06/09/2008 9:50 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>> However, I got talking to Rob McQueen - there's a certain amount of
>> sense in, instead of describing this in terms of IBB, describing it in
>> terms of Jingle.
>>
>> It's possible - and reasonable
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if existing clients and servers are that smart, but it
They will be if people discover that IBB is so good in passing through
firewalls.
--
Fabio Forno, Ph.D.
Bluendo srl http://www.bluendo.com
jabber i
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Justin Karneges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My plan has always been to use XEP-198 for this. If your server wants you to
> back off, it'll just not ack back to you over the c2s (or s2s) link.
> Similarly, a mobile client that is dying would just not ack back to t
