Brendan Taylor wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 06:11:56AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Brendan Taylor wrote:
>>> I just noticed this clause:
>>>
>>> ... but MUST NOT return a stream error in response to the receipt
>>> of [Bad XMLNS].
>>>
>>> Why is that there? Silently dropping the stan
Nicolas Roussel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone else interested in PDF documentation?
I am. I have been thinking about writing a stylesheet for generating
Texinfo from XEPs, which would give both PDF and Info output, the latter
being especially interesting for Emacs users.
Who knows, I
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 06:11:56AM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Brendan Taylor wrote:
> > I just noticed this clause:
> >
> > ... but MUST NOT return a stream error in response to the receipt
> > of [Bad XMLNS].
> >
> > Why is that there? Silently dropping the stanza seems like a bad ide
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:08:09PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> I did a bit of research on this. I propose the following text
>> (specifically the parenthetical clause):
>>
>>The result of the SRV lookup will be one or more combinations of
>>a port and
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 01:08:09PM -0600, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> I did a bit of research on this. I propose the following text
> (specifically the parenthetical clause):
>
>The result of the SRV lookup will be one or more combinations of
>a port and hostname, which hostnames th
