Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Linked Process Protocol

2009-09-28 Thread Marko A. Rodriguez
Hello, I'm reading over the comments about Linked Process now. I was on vacation for the last week and a half so I'm getting caught up on this thread of emails as well as the 300+ other emails I have in my inbox (doh!). On Sep 24, 2009, at 4:47 AM, Fabio Forno wrote: The big advantage

Re: [Standards] Presence and components

2009-09-28 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/25/09 8:57 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote: On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:33 AM, Paul Witty pau...@codian.com wrote: Is there documented anywhere the rules of how presence information works with components? e.g. can components subscribe to clients'

Re: [Standards] Action rules in XEP-0050

2009-09-28 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/25/09 9:05 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote: On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Fabio Forno fabio.fo...@gmail.com wrote: 2009/9/25 Remko Tronçon re...@el-tramo.be: Yep, which are the same actions, confusing users. No, they're not, which was the point of

Re: [Standards] Presence and components

2009-09-28 Thread Nathan Fritz
On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/25/09 8:57 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote: On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:33 AM, Paul Witty pau...@codian.com wrote: Is there documented anywhere the rules of how presence

Re: [Standards] Presence and components

2009-09-28 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/28/09 8:35 PM, Nathan Fritz wrote: On Sep 28, 2009, at 5:33 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/25/09 8:57 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote: On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:33 AM, Paul Witty