-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/25/09 9:05 AM, Nathan Fritz wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2009, at 3:35 AM, Fabio Forno <fabio.fo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/9/25 Remko Tronçon <re...@el-tramo.be>: >>>> Yep, which are the same actions, confusing users. >>> >>> No, they're not, which was the point of my rant. "Next" gets you on to >>> more advanced settings, whereas "Finish" just says "Skip the next >>> screens, the defaults are fine for me". >> >> I'd like to see some using this behavior, since it is really bad for >> users (much better a combo inside the form with "finish", "advanced >> options") > > I think it's a big assumption to say that it is bad behavior and to > explicitly prevent implementations from doing it. In fact, assuming that > a human being is using the forms is often an incorrect assumption. The > specs are meant to facilitate. If anything, an implementation guideline > note is all that is necessary.
I'm all in favor of implementation notes. XEP-0050 is on my list of specs to fix up this fall, so suggested text would be great (I'm happy to wordsmith further if needed). Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAkrBcUAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vyQ9gCcCRiCpHlwt4fzQwYaF3WY4Mwv 7QMAmPl1ikb0KjCcvwO6Q0Rzg2YrTsU= =8lCG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
