[Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread Kevin Smith
Following a discussion in jdev, I've thrown together the skeleton of a XEP for correcting previous messages. I'll clean it up before submitting, but the rough gist is at: http://www.doomsong.co.uk/extensions/render/xep-correct.html Discussion welcome. /K

Re: [Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread Guus der Kinderen
First thoughts: perhaps you should add a section that informs how to handle child elements of the message stanza other than body. XHTML-IM adds an child element that's typically related to the message body content, for example. Other child elements might not (nicknames, for example). Should the

Re: [Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread ctorrandell
La cuenta correo a la que ha escrito, se encuentra inactiva, en caso de necesitar contactar con el Departamento de Informática, ruego se pongan en contacto con nosotros por teléfono. Gracias y disculpe las molestias.

Re: [Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread ctorrandell
La cuenta correo a la que ha escrito, se encuentra inactiva, en caso de necesitar contactar con el Departamento de Informática, ruego se pongan en contacto con nosotros por teléfono. Gracias y disculpe las molestias.

Re: [Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread Kevin Smith
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Guus der Kinderen guus.der.kinde...@gmail.com wrote: First thoughts: perhaps you should add a section that informs how to handle child elements of the message stanza other than body. XHTML-IM adds an child element that's typically related to the message body

Re: [Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread Sergei Golovan
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote: Thanks - I've put in some placeholder text for this. Roughly - senders MUST send the same stanza, just corrected. And what if correction means changing the attached elements? For example: Message body: I send you these

Re: [Standards] Correcting last message

2010-07-20 Thread Kevin Smith
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Sergei Golovan sgolo...@nes.ru wrote: On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk wrote: Thanks - I've put in some placeholder text for this. Roughly - senders MUST send the same stanza, just corrected. And what if correction means

[Standards] Fwd: WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis-08

2010-07-20 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
FYI, this is your last chance to provide feedback on the core definitions of XMPP presence, rosters, and the like. Post to the x...@ietf.org list with your feedback: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp /psa Original Message Subject: WGLC of draft-ietf-xmpp-3921bis-08

Re: [Standards] XEP-0277 Feedback

2010-07-20 Thread Stephen Pendleton
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Guus der Kinderen Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 4:36 PM To: XMPP Standards Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0277 Feedback   I would not like to depend solely on ATOM (as Stephen suggests) as I'm still not comfortable with