Le 20/09/2010 22:31, Tuomas Koski wrote:
>
> IMHO it's up to the service to decide what kind of policy it follows.
> Let's not put that kind of business rules to the specs, right?
>
Au contraire, I think that it's important to specify how the user's
posts will be accessible. That's an (important)
Hi,
On 20 September 2010 20:35, Florent Le Coz wrote:
> Le 20/09/2010 15:05, Tuomas Koski wrote:
>> It might make sense to create a separate "replies" node for each post
>> when needed. Let's say that we have node "koski:microblog" that
>> includes all my "microblog" entries. When I receive a rep
Le 20/09/2010 15:05, Tuomas Koski wrote:
> It might make sense to create a separate "replies" node for each post
> when needed. Let's say that we have node "koski:microblog" that
> includes all my "microblog" entries. When I receive a reply to an item
> with id 123456 there would be a node "koski:m
On Wed Sep 15 21:47:30 2010, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
Title: Spim Markers and Reports
Abstract: This document defines an XMPP protocol extension that
enables XMPP entities to interact with spim filters by marking
unsolic
Hi,
I also noticed this problem, and Florent has well summarized it.
And what about Mercutio asking Romeo "What kind of beer do you prefer?"
Juliette would just see: ("@Mercutio: I prefer them blond.")
No comment... (even if I'm not sure of the color of Juliette's hairs)
Hoping you'll find a sol
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Florian Zeitz wrote:
> I disagree. The text does not explicitly talk about the JID. Removing
> 'example.com' is equivalent to removing "his or her own ownership" for
> 'm...@example.com'. However, regardless of the current text: Do you agree
> it makes sense for 'm
Hi,
On 20 September 2010 14:37, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Thu Sep 16 23:46:15 2010, Florent Le Coz wrote:
>>
>> In XEP 0277: Microblogging Over XMPP
>> (http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0277.html), it is stated "People can
>> reply to your posts, but not directly comment on them."
>
> [snip lots of
On Thu Sep 16 23:46:15 2010, Florent Le Coz wrote:
In XEP 0277: Microblogging Over XMPP
(http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0277.html), it is stated "People can
reply to your posts, but not directly comment on them."
[snip lots of stuff I agree with]
I know this would imply a big change of the XEP
Am 20.09.2010 04:32, schrieb Waqas Hussain:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Florian Zeitz wrote:
>> On 19.09.2010 04:09, Waqas Hussain wrote:
>>>
>>> That's only partially true. Full JIDs are still not allowed.
>>>
>> Not as far as I can tell. XEP-45 explicitly says:
>>
>>When an entity is
