On 9/14/11 4:31 PM, "Waqas Hussain" wrote:
> An entity which understood double verify would have the option to
> either be vulnerable to poisoning, or participate in IQ floods. It's
> this that I'm against.
Presumably, the new XEP would recommend that you negatively cache in the
case that it re
On Sep 14, 2011, at 16:31, Waqas Hussain wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew A. Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 14, 2011, at 13:40, Waqas Hussain wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> So.. which caps is included in presence? The current exploitable one?
>>> Then this doesn't help with preventing poison
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew A. Miller
wrote:
>
> On Sep 14, 2011, at 13:40, Waqas Hussain wrote:
>
>>
>> So.. which caps is included in presence? The current exploitable one?
>> Then this doesn't help with preventing poisoning, does it?
>>
>
> the caps hash would be as it is today. S
Agreed...
I would like Microsoft to pass through XEP-0301 (In-Band Real-Time Text).
I know that someone from Microsoft's team contacted me inquiring about
this; an steps from Microsoft should be encouraged.
Standardized tests such as Acid made Microsoft Internet Explorer 9
much more compliant, so
On 9/14/11 3:52 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 9/14/11 3:14 PM, David Ammouial wrote:
>> 14/09/2011, Justin:
>>> - login requires using a special SASL mechanism
>>> "X-MESSENGER-OAUTH2". - JIDs are {identifier}@messenger.live.com,
>>> where {identifier} comes from the OAuth access token.
>>
>>
On 9/14/11 3:53 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 9/14/11 1:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 9/14/11 1:12 PM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:52, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 9/14/11 12:49 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> Running some
> interop tests
Perha
On 9/14/11 1:49 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 9/14/11 1:12 PM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:52, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>>> On 9/14/11 12:49 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
Running some
interop tests
>>>
>>> Perhaps it's time for another online interop test?
>>
>> Pe
On 9/14/11 3:14 PM, David Ammouial wrote:
> 14/09/2011, Justin:
>> - login requires using a special SASL mechanism
>> "X-MESSENGER-OAUTH2". - JIDs are {identifier}@messenger.live.com,
>> where {identifier} comes from the OAuth access token.
>
> Could it be linked to this old, deferred specificati
14/09/2011, Justin:
> - login requires using a special SASL mechanism
> "X-MESSENGER-OAUTH2".
> - JIDs are {identifier}@messenger.live.com, where {identifier}
> comes from the OAuth access token.
Could it be linked to this old, deferred specification?
http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0235.html
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 01:02:13 PM Tobias Markmann wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 22:00, Justin Karneges
>
> wrote:
> > - login requires using a special SASL mechanism "X-MESSENGER-OAUTH2".
>
> Is that by any chance
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mills-kitten-sasl-oauth-03 ?
I
On Sep 14, 2011, at 13:40, Waqas Hussain wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Matthew A. Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:18, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I've been thinking of something that might be a less-awful compromise.
>>> I'll post to this list about it soon
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 22:00, Justin Karneges
wrote:
> - login requires using a special SASL mechanism "X-MESSENGER-OAUTH2".
>
Is that by any chance
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-mills-kitten-sasl-oauth-03 ?
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 12:25:52 PM Justin Karneges wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:43:38 AM Nicolas Vérité wrote:
> > Thanks for those of you who twitted it:
> > http://www.liveside.net/2011/09/14/messenger-connect-is-now-live-connect-
> > ne w-apis-for-skydrive-and-hotmail-c
On 9/14/11 1:12 PM, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:52, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 9/14/11 12:49 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>>> Running some
>>> interop tests
>>
>> Perhaps it's time for another online interop test?
>
> Perhaps it's time to go further than these interop tests
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Matthew A. Miller
wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 2011, at 12:18, Matthew A. Miller wrote:
>
>
>> I've been thinking of something that might be a less-awful compromise. I'll
>> post to this list about it soon for us all to mock and ridicule (-:
>>
>
> So, the less-awful c
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 9/7/11 8:51 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 9/7/11 2:33 PM, Joe Hildebrand wrote:
>>> On 9/5/11 6:39 AM, "Dave Cridland" wrote:
>>>
Of course, it may be simplest just to bite the bullet and switch hash
algorithm - or even
On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:43:38 AM Nicolas Vérité wrote:
> Thanks for those of you who twitted it:
> http://www.liveside.net/2011/09/14/messenger-connect-is-now-live-connect-ne
> w-apis-for-skydrive-and-hotmail-calendar/ XMPP Interface : You can
> integrate Messenger into your Web-based,
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 20:52, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 9/14/11 12:49 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
>> Running some
>> interop tests
>
> Perhaps it's time for another online interop test?
Perhaps it's time to go further than these interop tests?
--
Nicolas Vérité (Nÿco) mailto:nicolas.ver...@gma
On 9/14/11 12:49 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Wed Sep 14 18:43:38 2011, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
>> It's Microsoft! Quite a sign... but...
>>
>> Now, what we may see is cheating on the protocol, interop risks.
>
> I'd rather assume that any bugs in the implementation are just that -
> unintentional
On Wed Sep 14 18:43:38 2011, Nicolas Vérité wrote:
It's Microsoft! Quite a sign... but...
Now, what we may see is cheating on the protocol, interop risks.
I'd rather assume that any bugs in the implementation are just that -
unintentional errors - until we hear otherwise.
I hope they do ha
Hi,
Thanks for those of you who twitted it:
http://www.liveside.net/2011/09/14/messenger-connect-is-now-live-connect-new-apis-for-skydrive-and-hotmail-calendar/
XMPP Interface : You can integrate Messenger into your Web-based,
desktop, or mobile instant messaging products by connecting to our
XMPP
21 matches
Mail list logo
