Hello,
Am 23.09.2011 23:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote:
Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote:
Hi,
On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address
conference.domain.tld
I want to be able to create an
Am 23.09.2011 23:17, schrieb EcliptuX:
Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote:
Hi,
On my jabber server, I'm running a MUC on the address
conference.domain.tld
I want to be able to create an alias like muc.domain.tld, but the
XEP-0045 don't permit
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Hello,
Am 23.09.2011 23:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote:
Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
On 9/21/11 12:01 PM, EcliptuX wrote:
Hi,
On my jabber server, I'm
Am 24.09.2011 11:57, schrieb Kevin Smith:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Alexander Hollerhol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Hello,
Am 23.09.2011 23:19, schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
On 9/23/11 3:17 PM, EcliptuX wrote:
Le 23/09/2011 23:05, Peter Saint-Andre a écrit :
On 9/21/11 12:01 PM,
I think it would be better to say this room has moved. There is
mention of something like this in the section on destroying rooms[1],
but it's not mentioned how you should inform someone joining after the
room has been destroyed about the new location.
Current implementations (AFAIK) forget about
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:08 AM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:
On 9/20/11 6:00 PM, Evgeniy Khramtsov wrote:
On 20.09.2011 08:46, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 9/19/11 4:40 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
No, but maybe adding some muc-features which are making it obvious what
is
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 10:38 PM, Alexander Holler hol...@ahsoftware.de wrote:
Am 24.09.2011 11:57, schrieb Kevin Smith:
MUC aliasing is actually one of the very few cases in XMPP where
aliasing could work without protocol extensions. The server would know
which alias each client has joined
