On 01/10/2012 10:03 PM, Stephen Pendleton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:06 AM
To: standards@xmpp.org
Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
1. No, I
I have setup the membership application Wiki page for the next
application period Q1/2012
Applications are encouraged from developers and others who are actively
involved in the Jabber/XMPP community. To apply, create a page about
yourself on the Wiki:
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org]
On
Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:06 AM
To: standards@xmpp.org
Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
Anyway, what is your suggestion to me? I need the
On 01/11/2012 10:20 PM, Stephen Pendleton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org]
On
Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 3:06 AM
To: standards@xmpp.org
Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
Anyway, what
On Wed Jan 11 15:33:29 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
I will say it again: the solution may be implemented with transition
period which will support both methods. The second thing I already
said
that it will not broke clients at all. Servers upgrade is much
easier.
Good luck upgrading Google.
On 01/11/2012 10:37 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jan 11 15:33:29 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
I will say it again: the solution may be implemented with transition
period which will support both methods. The second thing I already said
that it will not broke clients at all. Servers upgrade is
On Wed Jan 11 15:49:58 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
On 01/11/2012 10:37 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jan 11 15:33:29 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
I will say it again: the solution may be implemented with
transition
period which will support both methods. The second thing I
already said
On 01/11/2012 10:57 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jan 11 15:49:58 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
On 01/11/2012 10:37 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Wed Jan 11 15:33:29 2012, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
I will say it again: the solution may be implemented with transition
period which will support both
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Sergey Dobrov bin...@jrudevels.org wrote:
At least, it has no real disadvantages except of this one which, I
agree, is important. But I will ask again, what can I do except of
invent YAX?
Perhaps it would be helpful (for those of us watching in black and
white,
On 01/11/2012 11:19 PM, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Sergey Dobrov bin...@jrudevels.org wrote:
At least, it has no real disadvantages except of this one which, I
agree, is important. But I will ask again, what can I do except of
invent YAX?
Perhaps it would be helpful
FYI.
Original Message
Subject: [Summit] deadline for FOSDEM talks
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:31:27 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
Reply-To: XMPP Summit sum...@xmpp.org
To: XMPP Summit sum...@xmpp.org
If you'd like to give a talk in the XMPP devroom at FOSDEM
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:48 AM
To: standards@xmpp.org
Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
(Arrows show a direction in which presences and events
On 01/12/2012 12:54 AM, Stephen Pendleton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: standards-boun...@xmpp.org [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On
Behalf Of Sergey Dobrov
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:48 AM
To: standards@xmpp.org
Subject: Re: [Standards] PEP and PubSub
(Arrows
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 17:33 +0700, Sergey Dobrov wrote:
Matt Wild's upcoming archiving spec is a good candidate for this.
/K
Where I can take a look on it?
Here: http://matthewwild.co.uk/uploads/message-archive-management.html
Also, someone already started implementing this ;)
14 matches
Mail list logo