Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

2012-07-03 Thread Mark Rejhon
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > I'll replace the word glyph with character. The problem is I am trying > > to be consistent with what "character" means. RFC6365 has multiple > > interpretations for the word "character", too. Is it a code point? > > Is it a displayab

Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

2012-07-03 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 7/3/12 5:10 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre > wrote: > > > A minor edit to to clarify this for multiple characters forming one > > glyph, is to add "incompletely formed glyphs" to the list in the > > paranthesis.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

2012-07-03 Thread Mark Rejhon
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > > A minor edit to to clarify this for multiple characters forming one > > glyph, is to add "incompletely formed glyphs" to the list in the > > paranthesis. Would that make sense? > > Do you mean multiple code points forming one character?

Re: [Standards] Why XMPP is going on the wrong way for Pubsub commenting

2012-07-03 Thread Tim
Sorry for my wrong manipulation, I've sent a non-finished email. For the XML part : hanging out at the Café Napolitano tag:montague.lit,2008-05-08:posts-1cb57d9c-1c46-11dd-838c-001143d5d5db 2008-05-08T18:30:02Z 2008-05-08T18:30:02Z

[Standards] Why XMPP is going on the wrong way for Pubsub commenting

2012-07-03 Thread Tim
I'm Jaussoin Timothée, founder of the Movim project (http://movim.eu/), about 4 years ago we make the choice of XMPP for our project. With the important decision to use Pubsub for the stream of our users. Since I've read and learn a lot on XMPP and Pubsub to implement cleanly in Movim. We also mak

Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

2012-07-03 Thread Kurt Zeilenga
On Jul 3, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Do you mean multiple code points forming one character? I still find the > use of the term 'glyph' confusing here and would prefer to leave it out > if possible, because it doesn't seem that we're really talking about > "The actual, concrete

Re: [Standards] XEP-0301 Real-Time Text: Unicode normalization, bidirectional, right-to-left text, etc. -- Comments needed

2012-07-03 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 7/2/12 3:35 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote: > > On 2012-07-02 2:45 PM, "Kurt Zeilenga" > wrote: >> But I wonder if the XEP needs to say something about changes in valid > text to valid text which might produce invalid text in the edit? > Consider, if user replaces the