Re: [Standards] Websockets and session resuming

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/3/13 8:57 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2013 3:09 PM, "Salvatore Loreto" > > wrote: >> >> On 2/3/13 5:03 PM, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Feb 3, 2013 3:00 PM, "Salvatore Loreto" >

Re: [Standards] Fwd: [Summit] BOSH actions

JSJaC doesn't either. And at least the old implementation of ejabberd's mod_http_bind didn't as well. .Steve Am 04.02.2013 um 22:39 schrieb Steffen Larsen : > Just checked strophe, and it does not use it. I'll check some more > implementations that uses BOSH for transport. Maybe that would giv

Re: [Standards] Fwd: [Summit] BOSH actions

Just checked strophe, and it does not use it. I'll check some more implementations that uses BOSH for transport. Maybe that would give us an indication. /Steffen On Feb 4, 2013, at 10:06 PM, "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" wrote: > That sounds sensible. > > Sent from mobile, might be terse

Re: [Standards] Fwd: [Summit] BOSH actions

That sounds sensible. Sent from mobile, might be terse On Feb 4, 2013, at 1:26 PM, "Ashley Ward" wrote: > It would be great to keep them consistent, but is it worth potentially > breaking implementations? I think the main problem with accept was that > the example was inconsistent with the te

Re: [Standards] Fwd: [Summit] BOSH actions

It would be great to keep them consistent, but is it worth potentially breaking implementations? I think the main problem with accept was that the example was inconsistent with the text. In fact, I very much doubt anyone should be using that option as xmpp mandates the use of utf-8, and I doubt an

[Standards] Fwd: [Summit] BOSH actions

Cross-posted from the summit list (sorry making noise). Here are my small notes to the BOSH action list (embedded). /Steffen Begin forwarded message: > From: "Peter Saint-Andre (psaintan)" > Subject: Re: [Summit] BOSH actions > Date: February 2, 2013 10:18:01 PM GMT+01:00 > To: XMPP Summit >