[Standards] Changes missing from RFC 6120's “Differences from RFC 3920”

2013-02-15 Thread Will Thompson
Hi, I noticed that the set of stanza-level errors changed between 3920 and 6120 today, but that http://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6120.html#diffs is incomplete. It mentions the removal of payment-required from the set of defined stanza-level errors, but does not mention the addition of: •

Re: [Standards] BOSH and legacy auth - do we have to be backwards compatible?

2013-02-15 Thread Winfried Tilanus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/08/2013 06:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Hi, I think we can remove the XEP-0078 references. It has been obsolete since 2008. Steve, there seem to be no objections. Do you write a patch for it? Winfried -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

Re: [Standards] BOSH and legacy auth - do we have to be backwards compatible?

2013-02-15 Thread Stefan Strigler
OK! Am 15.02.2013 um 13:14 schrieb Winfried Tilanus winfr...@tilanus.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 02/08/2013 06:28 PM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Hi, I think we can remove the XEP-0078 references. It has been obsolete since 2008. Steve, there seem to be no

Re: [Standards] PEP - Public PubSub subscribed list

2013-02-15 Thread Ashley Ward
On 15/02/2013 14:48, Tim edhe...@gmail.com wrote: We are currently working on the XEP. Is there some comments to make on this new structure ? Adding arbitrary attributes to the item element would either require namespacing them, or a change to the pubsub schema. Also the item element should

Re: [Standards] PEP - Public PubSub subscribed list

2013-02-15 Thread Dave Cridland
On Feb 15, 2013 3:10 PM, Ashley Ward ashley.w...@surevine.com wrote: On 15/02/2013 14:48, Tim edhe...@gmail.com wrote: We are currently working on the XEP. Is there some comments to make on this new structure ? Adding arbitrary attributes to the item element would either require