Re: [Standards] ProtoXEP: Impact of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback

2014-02-28 Thread Philipp Hancke
For the record, Dave just fulfilled the promise given in http://logs.jabber.org/j...@conference.jabber.org/2009-04-14.html#15:10:06

Re: [Standards] ProtoXEP: Impact of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback

2014-02-28 Thread Philipp Hancke
Am 28.02.2014 18:37, schrieb Dave Cridland: I hereby assign any and all rights and ownership in this document that I may possess to the XMPP Standards Foundation, and promise to perfect any such assignment in writing as required. So do I (implicitly on all my submissions, but thanks for the rem

Re: [Standards] ProtoXEP: Impact of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback

2014-02-28 Thread Dave Cridland
I hereby assign any and all rights and ownership in this document that I may possess to the XMPP Standards Foundation, and promise to perfect any such assignment in writing as required. On 28 February 2014 17:34, Philipp Hancke wrote: > Oh mighty XEP Editor team, > > we humble authors do implor

[Standards] ProtoXEP: Impact of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback

2014-02-28 Thread Philipp Hancke
Oh mighty XEP Editor team, we humble authors do implore and beseech thee to accept this specification on the impacts of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback. %ents; ]> Impact of TLS and DNSSEC on Dialback This specification provides documentation how Server Dialback is used together with Transpor

Re: [Standards] XEP-0134: XMPP Design Guidelines

2014-02-28 Thread Peter Saint-Andre
On 2/28/14, 3:56 AM, Winfried Tilanus wrote: On 02/28/2014 10:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: Hi, Does anyone use this document? I did. I think it's useful (or could be) for several purposes: to help people making custom extensions, to help people writing proto-XEPs, and to help guide our ow

Re: [Standards] XEP-0134: XMPP Design Guidelines

2014-02-28 Thread Winfried Tilanus
On 02/28/2014 10:49 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: Hi, > Does anyone use this document? I did. Winfried

Re: [Standards] XEP-0134: XMPP Design Guidelines

2014-02-28 Thread Dave Cridland
On 28 February 2014 00:24, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > Yes, that document is probably well out of date now. Do we feel it would > be worth the effort to bring it into the modern world? I'd welcome any effort that was made. Unfortunately, I suspect that the people best able to do this are the Co

Re: [Standards] XEP-0134: XMPP Design Guidelines

2014-02-28 Thread Steffen Larsen
Yes, you are right Christian. I think that maybe the editor team will create some script that might reveal some of our XEPs that need to be updated into new states etc. /Steffen On 28 Feb 2014, at 09:10, Christian Schudt wrote: > Hi, > > I always like up to date documents and specifications.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0134: XMPP Design Guidelines

2014-02-28 Thread Christian Schudt
Hi, I always like up to date documents and specifications. So I vote yes :-) In my opinion, there are (too) many "last-updated-2004" documents. (or at least mid-2000s) Or generally documents, which are really long in Draft state. (XEP-0001 says it can become Final after 6 months in Draft and 2