On 11/27/2014 03:34 PM, Goffi wrote:
Hi Sergey,
* server will have to refuse stanzas with these namespaces when
component is down by some reason, so the namespace lease is permanent
and does not need any negotiation
That's a good point, actually the bahaviour is not specified when
Hi,
here’s my feedback for it.
1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to
clarify an existing protocol?
No. In my opinion, XEP-0256: Last Activity in Presence already covers
everything, which is needed for this use case.
XEP-0012 also says something about
Hi,
Some comments from the author’s perspective inline.
On 03.12.2014, at 19:16, XMPP Extensions Editor edi...@xmpp.org wrote:
1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to
clarify an existing protocol?
It fills a gap for a clean and reliable reporting of
How does the server, after it has responded to the IQ with a type=result
stanza, communicate errors in processing the query to the client that might
subsequently occur. What if the server is unable to send any subsequent
stanzas associated with the query? Is the server expected to hold off
On 03.12.2014 19:16, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0319 (Last
User Interaction in Presence).
Abstract: This specification defines a way to communicate time of last user
interaction with her system using XMPP presence
On 03.12.2014 23:39, Florian Schmaus wrote:
On 03.12.2014 19:16, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0319
(Last User Interaction in Presence).
Abstract: This specification defines a way to communicate time of last user
On 3 December 2014 at 23:14, Florian Schmaus f...@geekplace.eu wrote:
BTW was it ever discussed to *simply* extend XEP-12 (and thus XEP-256)
with an (optional) 'timestamp' attribute that contains an absolute time
value?
I'd particularly like to see any response to this. It looks like a very
Hi all,
If I need to implement a functionality (in an XMPP client and in an XMPP
server) whereby I indicate to a user if a message sent by him to another
user has been read/delivered/acknowledged, which XEP should I be
implementing? Additionally, I want the status of the messages to be synced
I like Florian’s idea!
It won’t mess up with existing XEP-0256 implementations and if someone really
feels he can only deal with absolute timestamps he could use that optional
attribute.
It’s way easier to implement as opposed to implement a whole new XEP (+
abstraction layer, which deals with
