[Standards] Questions regarding Diffie-Hellman

Hello Regarding the latest report concerning vulnerabilities in the Diffie-Hellman key Exchange [1] (short introduction in [2]) and the logjam attack [3], is there anyone with experience in securing encypted channels or end-to-end-encrypted channels using either 2048 bit keys or elliptic

Re: [Standards] Stream Management and BOSH

On 19 October 2015 at 12:27, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if this was discussed already or not but I couldn't find > anything trustworthy about combining Stream Management with BOSH. > > I'd like to hear an opinion from the community

Re: [Standards] Stream Management and BOSH

On 19.10.2015 13:27, Michal Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I don't know if this was discussed already or not but I couldn't find > anything trustworthy about combining Stream Management with BOSH. > > I'd like to hear an opinion from the community regarding using Stream > Management over BOSH. It

Re: [Standards] Stream Management and BOSH

While BOSH has it's own acknowledgement mechanism, there are still some subtle differences when it comes to resumption: With resumption you don't need to: - re-request the roster - resend presence - re-establish state information (as mentioned in XEP-0198) I see performance benefits (less HTTP

[Standards] Stream Management and BOSH

Hi, I don't know if this was discussed already or not but I couldn't find anything trustworthy about combining Stream Management with BOSH. I'd like to hear an opinion from the community regarding using Stream Management over BOSH. It looks like these two can be combined but the questions are:

Re: [Standards] Presences of Contacts in Search Result

For internal contact only you might want to check out: http://www.xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0144.html#entities-groupservice If you server administrator allows it and you server supports it. “A group service enables an

Re: [Standards] Presences of Contacts in Search Result

On 19 October 2015 at 00:25, Phuong Vo wrote: > According to your reply, if I want to see presences of all contacts in > search result, I have to add them to roster. That is just fine for single > endpoint; however, jabber supports multiple endpoints (the same users can > login

Re: [Standards] Presences of Contacts in Search Result

l the technical content on > > >>> http://new.xmpp.org/ for correctness > > > > > > The new website looks great, congrats ! I'm just wondering if "The most > > secure > > > messaging protocol" and "Privacy-focused" is suitable when we still &

Re: [Standards] Presences of Contacts in Search Result

> > > > > > Thanks > > Goffi > > > > > > -- > > > > Subject: Digest Footer > > > > ___ > > Standards mailing list > > Standards@xmpp.org > &g