Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

On 30 Sep 2016, at 17:25, Dave Cridland wrote: > > On 30 September 2016 at 17:12, Kevin Smith wrote: >> On 30 Sep 2016, at 10:01, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> >>> On 30 September 2016 at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote:

Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

On 30 September 2016 at 17:12, Kevin Smith wrote: > On 30 Sep 2016, at 10:01, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> On 30 September 2016 at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote: >>> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:58, Dave Cridland wrote:

Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

On 30 Sep 2016, at 10:01, Dave Cridland wrote: > > On 30 September 2016 at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote: >> >>> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:58, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 29 Sep 2016 22:00, "Kevin Smith"

[Standards] XEP-0369 (MIX) - Added User Preference Protocol to version 0.4

As the PR for 0.4 of MIX is still pending, I decided to slip in a few more changes.The key change is adding protocol to support user preference setting. Steve ___ Standards mailing list Info:

Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

On 30 September 2016 at 09:49, Kevin Smith wrote: > >> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:58, Dave Cridland wrote: >> >> >> On 29 Sep 2016 22:00, "Kevin Smith" wrote: >> > >> > On 29 Sep 2016, at 21:17, Dave Cridland wrote:

Re: [Standards] XEP-0308: Last Message Correction and Carbons

> On 29 Sep 2016, at 22:58, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > On 29 Sep 2016 22:00, "Kevin Smith" wrote: > > > > On 29 Sep 2016, at 21:17, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > (And please, folks, unless you can think of something I can't, a > > >

Re: [Standards] XEP-0359 Client vs. non-client IDs

I agree with Kev. If an entity does not wish to expose its address, it can simply choose to not provide the 'by' attribute. There's need to explicitly define the client/server role in that action too, right? - Guus On 29 September 2016 at 20:18, Kevin Smith wrote: > On