Couldn't we also support trigger warnings within this context in the same
way?
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:33 AM Lance Stout wrote:
> The element can be used to display human readable text via
> the `hint` attribute, so it should be noted that multiple
> elements could be present with different `
On 2 Nov 2016 02:25, "XMPP Extensions Editor" wrote:
>
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: Spoiler messages
>
> Abstract:
> This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension that provides
a
> method for indicating a message is a spoiler an
> On 1-Nov-2016, at 22:25, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
>
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: Spoiler messages
>
> Abstract:
> This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension that provides a
> method for indicating a message is a spo
Like
and then
etc...
Greets, Stefan
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:40 AM Stefan Strigler
wrote:
> Couldn't we also support trigger warnings within this context in the same
> way?
>
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 3:33 AM Lance Stout wrote:
>
> The element can be used to display human readable text v
Thank you very much for the feedback we are receiving about Spoilers.
*Regarding 'xml:lang' values for hints
It is indeed a good idea. We didn't think about and it.
*About RFC 2119 keywords use:
Using as an example «Users SHOULD be able to uncover or hide a spoiler message
at will, anytime.», wh