[Standards] NEW: XEP-0389 (Extensible In-Band Registration)

Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0389 (Extensible In-Band Registration) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines an XMPP protocol extension for in-band registration with instant messaging servers and other services with which an XMPP entity may initiate a stream. It aims to

[Standards] NEW: XEP-0388 (Extensible SASL Profile)

Version 0.1.0 of XEP-0388 (Extensible SASL Profile) has been released. Abstract: This document describes a replacement for the SASL profile documented in RFC 6120 which allows for greater extensibility. Changelog: [See revision history] (XEP Editor (ssw)) Diff:

[Standards] DRAFT: XEP-0233 (XMPP Server Registration for use with Kerberos V5)

Version 1.0.0 of XEP-0233 (XMPP Server Registration for use with Kerberos V5) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines the Kerberos principal name of an XMPP server. It also details a method by which a connecting client can determine this Kerberos principal name when

Re: [Standards] [Council] Council Meeting Minutes for 2017-03-08

On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Gultsch wrote: > 2. Entity Caps 2 > > Vote on accepting Entity Caps 2 > (https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/ecaps2.html) as experimental. +1 ___ Standards mailing list Info:

Re: [Standards] [Council] Council Meeting Minutes for 2017-03-08

On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Tobias Markmann wrote: > 2. Entity Caps 2 >> >> Vote on accepting Entity Caps 2 >> (https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/ecaps2.html) as experimental. >> >> Daniel +1 >> >> Other to vote on list >> >> Council agrees that

Re: [Standards] [Council] Council Meeting Minutes for 2017-03-08

On 16 March 2017 at 12:31, Dave Cridland wrote: > On 8 March 2017 at 17:50, Daniel Gultsch wrote: >> Council agrees that this needs more list discussion on list on whether >> this should be an inplace upgrade to XEP-0115. If it becomes a new XEP >> depending

Re: [Standards] [Council] Council Meeting Minutes for 2017-03-08

On 8 March 2017 at 17:50, Daniel Gultsch wrote: > 2. Entity Caps 2 > > Vote on accepting Entity Caps 2 > (https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/ecaps2.html) as experimental. > > Daniel +1 > +1 to this. > Other to vote on list > > Council agrees that this needs

Re: [Standards] XSF Council Minutes: 28 February 2017

On 28 February 2017 at 16:37, JC Brand wrote: > 2) Georg opened an PR on MUC private messages, > https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/436 > > Dave Cridland thinks it needs some security considerations, in particular > around replacing/removing client-added stuff. I'm not wild

Re: [Standards] New Format for MIX proxy JID

Looks reasonable to me. I'd appreciate a namespace bump. On 16 March 2017 at 11:03, Steve Kille wrote: > > Georg has suggested a new order for proxy JID. I've discussed with Kevin > Smith and we think the rationale for change of order makes sense. > > The original

[Standards] New Format for MIX proxy JID

Georg has suggested a new order for proxy JID. I've discussed with Kevin Smith and we think the rationale for change of order makes sense. The original rationale for this syntax as to align to "plus addressing" used with email address. If we are going to change the order a new separator seems

Re: [Standards] MIX, MAM, jidmap, and Jid-Hidden

On 15 March 2017 at 17:46, Kevin Smith wrote: > I’ve not done the research I should have before responding to this, so > apologies if what I say is patently stupid. > >> On 15 Mar 2017, at 14:36, Dave Cridland wrote: >>> On 15 March 2017 at 14:02, Steve

Re: [Standards] I propose to remove "Prefer Hidden" from core MIX

Dave, > -Original Message- > From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave > Cridland > Sent: 16 March 2017 09:10 > To: XMPP Standards > Subject: Re: [Standards] I propose to remove "Prefer Hidden" from core MIX > > I would like to object to removing

[Standards] Council Meeting Minutes for 2017-03-15

1. Roll call ( http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-03-15/#16:00:45 ) - Tobias (chairing) - Sam - Dave - Daniel excused - Link Mauve not present 2. Minute Taker ( http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2017-03-15/#16:04:44 ) === Tobias says he will write up the meeting minutes 3.

Re: [Standards] I propose to remove "Prefer Hidden" from core MIX

I would like to object to removing user-controlled visibility. Of the two visibility controls, I would infinitely prefer to remove the channel-level control, in fact - the notion that the visibility of your jid should be under the control of a third party just seems fundamentally wrong - but I'm