Here is a link to the rendered version:
https://geekplace.eu/xeps/xep-jet/xep-jet.html
Greetings vv
Am 06.09.2017 um 18:46 schrieb Paul Schaub:
>
> Hello everyone!
>
> To get back to topic: I made some changes based on your feedback.
> Basically my plan is to split JET up into a main XEP and som
Hello everyone!
To get back to topic: I made some changes based on your feedback.
Basically my plan is to split JET up into a main XEP and some subprotocols.
As Daniel suggested, JET will only contain reusable stuff and has no
more mentions of OMEMO and OX. Instead I used "stub" encryption method
2017-09-06 XSF Council Minutes
==
Present: Tobias, Link Mauve, SamWhited
Minute taker: jcbrand
* The Trello board needs updating.
* Tobias will give jcbrand (acting as editor) access to the Trello board so
that he might add things to the council board.
* Date of next
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017, at 01:44, Remko Tronçon wrote:
> (e.g. no IBR, harder proof of validity)
XEP-0389 [1] was written to help with this. Feedback, implementations,
and mechanisms to make mass registrations harder are appreciated.
—Sam
[1]: https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0389.html
_
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:18:09 +0200
Georg Lukas wrote:
> a) Throttle per-IP IBR attempts
How? By restricting a period a single IP can register an account?
Doesn't work: spammers walk through the huge list of servers,
effectively bypassing the restriction.
> b) Throttle outgoing presence/messages fro
Hi,
just to add some (controversial) points to the SPAM debate:
The XSNDR spam is ridiculously easy to filter with some heuristics
(and prosody's mod_firewall). I'm blocking north of 10K messages per
day on yax.im. If you are still getting spam from XSNDR, your server
operator needs some urgent h
On 6 September 2017 at 08:29, Evgeny Khramtsov wrote:
> The problem is, last time I checked[1], one third of ejabberd servers
> were running ancient versions, like 5 years old or more. There are also
> lots of jabberd servers, not sure they have any registration protection
> at all. Seems like we
Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:44:22 +0200
Remko Tronçon wrote:
> I was sort of hoping that you would come up with a magic trick after
> getting through your reading list.
Hehe, most of the problems in that list is about how to authenticate
remote servers in SMTP (like SPF, DKIM and so on). I didn't find lo
