Kevin Smith :
The only RFC6121 rule that needs to go is the re-routing of "chat"
messages sent to an unavailable full-JID: §8.5.3.2.1.
https://xmpp.org/rfcs/rfc6121.html#rules-localpart-fulljid-nomatch
I think that if we start sending chat messages always to the bare JID,
we don’t even need this
On 11.11.2017 12:04, Georg Lukas wrote:
> * Florian Schmaus [2017-11-10 21:54]:
>>> - bare-JID = all-clients + archive
>>> - full-JID = single client, no carbons, no archive, no redirection
>>
>> Which rules of RFC 6121 do you exactly need/want to bend or violate?
>
> The only RFC6121 rule that n
On 11 Nov 2017, at 11:04, Georg Lukas wrote:
>
> * Florian Schmaus [2017-11-10 21:54]:
>>> - bare-JID = all-clients + archive
>>> - full-JID = single client, no carbons, no archive, no redirection
>>
>> Which rules of RFC 6121 do you exactly need/want to bend or violate?
>
> The only RFC6121 r
On 11 Nov 2017, at 11:01, Georg Lukas wrote:
>
> * Kevin Smith [2017-11-10 21:31]:
>> I don’t think this needs a new session type. It would be sufficient to
>> enable these rules when clients enable ‘mamsub’ (for want of a better
>> term).
>
> You are probably right, but my ideas about mamsub s
* Florian Schmaus [2017-11-10 21:54]:
> > - bare-JID = all-clients + archive
> > - full-JID = single client, no carbons, no archive, no redirection
>
> Which rules of RFC 6121 do you exactly need/want to bend or violate?
The only RFC6121 rule that needs to go is the re-routing of "chat"
messages
* Kevin Smith [2017-11-10 21:31]:
> I don’t think this needs a new session type. It would be sufficient to
> enable these rules when clients enable ‘mamsub’ (for want of a better
> term).
You are probably right, but my ideas about mamsub so far involve
changing the routing behavior for messages,
* Daniel Gultsch [2017-11-10 21:15]:
> I think there is even a XEP recommending sending to full jids.
Do you mean resource locking? As Kev said, we should probably get rid of
it for messages but possibly keep it for IQs.
> > https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/XMPP_2.0)
> I always advocate simple solution