* Daniel Gultsch <dan...@gultsch.de> [2017-11-10 21:15]: > I think there is even a XEP recommending sending to full jids.
Do you mean resource locking? As Kev said, we should probably get rid of it for messages but possibly keep it for IQs. > > https://wiki.xmpp.org/web/XMPP_2.0) > I always advocate simple solutions. (See my <transient/> proposal.) > and this proposal is - in some ways - even simpler. > > I'm really not sure how the transition to 'XMPP 2.0' would look like thought. This needs some more discussion indeed. The wiki page outlines a kind-of-strawman proposal for a migration path, where message hints are added/processed on the servers at the border of "XMPP 2.0" domains. Georg -- || http://op-co.de ++ GCS d--(++) s: a C+++ UL+++ !P L+++ !E W+++ N ++ || gpg: 0x962FD2DE || o? K- w---() O M V? PS+ PE-- Y++ PGP+ t+ 5 R+ || || Ge0rG: euIRCnet || X(+++) tv+ b+(++) DI+++ D- G e++++ h- r++ y? || ++ IRCnet OFTC OPN ||_________________________________________________||
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
