Re: [Standards] XEP-0045 MUC: am I still there?

2018-04-11 Thread Georg Lukas
* Florian Schmaus [2018-04-11 19:07]: > > If Juliet is not joined, the MUC will respond with > > . > I feel like this is missing "or if the ping request does not originate > from Juliet". Or is this intentional? Responding with is the correct behavior for messages sent to a participant while not

Re: [Standards] XEP-0045 MUC: am I still there?

2018-04-11 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 10.04.2018 15:08, Georg Lukas wrote: > * Georg Lukas [2017-10-04 10:21]: >> 2. Create a new, explicit am-I-joined IQ that a client can send to the >>MUC JID. > > This seems to be the winner of the discussion from last October, even > though it was qualified as a "sticking plaster". > > To