On April 23, 2018 5:34:06 PM GMT+02:00, Steve Kille
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Manuel Rubio
>> Sent: 23 April 2018 16:12
>> To: XMPP Standards
>> Cc: Steve Kille
>> Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0369: MIX - About create a room/channel
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> thanks for yo
I note that my suggestion in the MUC for this was that there were three
outcomes from an LC, and Council will pick which. Draft, Rejected or
Experimental, and Rejected really did mean rejected.
/K
> On 23 Apr 2018, at 19:11, Dave Cridland wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23 April 2018 at 17:59, Matthew Wi
On 23 April 2018 at 17:59, Matthew Wild wrote:
> On 23 April 2018 at 16:46, Dave Cridland wrote:
> > -1 to removing Proposed. We only know there's a problem because a bunch
> of
> > XEPs are sitting in Proposed; removing Proposed wouldn't remove the
> problem,
> > just the fact we can see it. I'
On 23 April 2018 at 16:46, Dave Cridland wrote:
> -1 to removing Proposed. We only know there's a problem because a bunch of
> XEPs are sitting in Proposed; removing Proposed wouldn't remove the problem,
> just the fact we can see it. I'd really like a similar state during the CFE,
> since that's
-1 to removing Proposed. We only know there's a problem because a bunch of
XEPs are sitting in Proposed; removing Proposed wouldn't remove the
problem, just the fact we can see it. I'd really like a similar state
during the CFE, since that's quite hard to manage.
My preferred change would be to up
> -Original Message-
> From: Manuel Rubio
> Sent: 23 April 2018 16:12
> To: XMPP Standards
> Cc: Steve Kille
> Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0369: MIX - About create a room/channel
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> thanks for your answers. About one I think was omitted, if I (hag66) create a
> channe
Hi Steve,
thanks for your answers. About one I think was omitted, if I (hag66)
create a channel saying the owners are "hecate" and "greymalkin", am I
an owner for that channel?
Thanks.
Manuel Rubio.
El 2018-04-23 15:46, Steve Kille escribió:
Manuel,
-Original Message-
From: Standa
On 23 Apr 2018, at 15:09, Matthew Wild wrote:
> We have a number of XEPs stuck in 'proposed' with an expired Last Call.
>
> I think the reality is that the council "rejected" these, or last call
> feedback is awaiting to be incorporated. By "rejected" I mean to imply
> that the council didn't wan
On 4/23/18 8:09 AM, Matthew Wild wrote:
> We have a number of XEPs stuck in 'proposed' with an expired Last Call.
>
> I think the reality is that the council "rejected" these, or last call
> feedback is awaiting to be incorporated. By "rejected" I mean to imply
> that the council didn't want to ad
We have a number of XEPs stuck in 'proposed' with an expired Last Call.
I think the reality is that the council "rejected" these, or last call
feedback is awaiting to be incorporated. By "rejected" I mean to imply
that the council didn't want to advance the XEP yet (presumably based
on LC feedback
Manuel,
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards On Behalf Of Manuel Rubio
> Sent: 23 April 2018 09:30
> To: standards@xmpp.org
> Subject: [Standards] XEP-0369: MIX - About create a room/channel
>
> Hello,
>
> I was reading today the create form for the room creation. I have several
> dou
Hello,
I was reading today the create form for the room creation. I have
several doubts about that. First one, is it possible to include as many
owners as I want and they are supposed to be included in the channel or
only are intended to be owners when they join to the channel?
12 matches
Mail list logo
