Am Mi., 31. Juli 2019 um 18:20 Uhr schrieb Ненахов Андрей <
andrew.nenak...@redsolution.ru>:
> The fallback to message reactions is no reactions. If a user is using
> a legacy client, message reactions will likely flood his messenger.
> Fallback *could* be done via quote of a previous message an a
On 15.07.19 17:57, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> The XMPP Extensions Editor has received a proposal for a new XEP.
>
> Title: Message Reactions
> Abstract:
> This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
>
> URL: https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html
>
> Th
> HELLO I AM REACTING WITH A THUMBS UP EMOJI PLEASE UPGRADE YOUR MUA SO YOU CAN
> SEE MY REACTION WHICH IS A THUMBS UP EMOJI BY THE WAY DID I MENTION THAT
> THANKS
:frowning_face:
___
Standards mailing list
Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinf
The fallback to message reactions is no reactions. If a user is using
a legacy client, message reactions will likely flood his messenger.
Fallback *could* be done via quote of a previous message an appended
reaction symbol. But it should not be done at all.
ср, 31 июл. 2019 г. в 21:00, Dave Cridla
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019 at 16:43, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On 31 Jul 2019, at 16:40, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> >
> > On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 22:00:30 CEST Marvin W wrote:
> >>> Backward compatibility
> >>
> >> There clearly have been opposing opinions on that matter. I believe they
> >> are partly drive
Blah, I flipped 367 and 372 a couple of times here. I’m fine with using
Attaching for this and not References - apply that rule whenever I screwed up
the numbers.
/K
> On 31 Jul 2019, at 16:58, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
> On 24 Jul 2019, at 21:00, Marvin W wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> * Jonas Schäfe
On 24 Jul 2019, at 21:00, Marvin W wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> * Jonas Schäfer [2019-07-15 17:59]:
>> Title: Message Reactions
>> This specification defines a way for adding reactions to a message.
>
> Given the feedback this proposed XEP received, I'd like to drop a few
> more comments on the issues
On 31 Jul 2019, at 16:40, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 22:00:30 CEST Marvin W wrote:
>>> Backward compatibility
>>
>> There clearly have been opposing opinions on that matter. I believe they
>> are partly driven by different understanding on how Reactions might be
>> used
On Mittwoch, 24. Juli 2019 22:00:30 CEST Marvin W wrote:
> > Backward compatibility
>
> There clearly have been opposing opinions on that matter. I believe they
> are partly driven by different understanding on how Reactions might be
> used in the wild, but I doubt there will be any way to reach c
> On 29 Jul 2019, at 02:15, Tedd Sterr wrote:
>
>
> 2019-07-17 (expiring 2019-07-31)
>
> Proposed XMPP Extension: Anonymous unique occupant identifiers for MUCs
> -https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/occupant-id.html
> Dave: [pending]
> Georg: +1 (would rather see occupant IDs in the form of J
The XMPP Council will be holding it's regular meeting today, in fact almost
now (Wednesday) at 1500 UTC. The agenda is collated from (in order of
reliability):
* Github pull requests and issues marked "Needs Council":
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/labels/Needs%20Council
* Random mails from Standards
On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 at 02:15, Tedd Sterr wrote:
> *2019-07-10 (expired 2019-07-24)*
>
> PASSED (-0:1:+4)
> *PR #797 - XEP-0128: Remove 'unlikely' statement* -
> https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/797
> Dave: +1
> Georg: +1 (looks straight-forward; pretty sure it's not a breaking change)
> Jonas: +1
12 matches
Mail list logo
