[Standards] XEP-0054: vcard-temp

2009-07-29 Thread Daniel Willmann
saves the xml, but jabberd2 (at least with the mysql storage) stores the data in individual fields and so ignores EXTADR. Now I just want to make sure that EXTADD is indeed correct an I'll file the appropriate bugs at the Psi and Gajim bugtracker. Regards, Daniel Willmann signature.asc Description

Re: [Standards] new gateway types

2008-05-25 Thread Daniel Henninger
of having to pick something arbitrary and then maybe getting fussed at for picking the wrong thing. ;) Daniel On 5/25/08 11:15 AM, Michal 'vorner' Vaner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 01:47:16AM +0200, Magnus Henoch wrote: Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

[Standards] Strictness of disco types

2008-03-06 Thread Daniel Henninger
kind of like the idea of categorizing it differently. I'd like to hear opinions on this front though. I'm not 100% sure why text and irc are different though. Just 'cause? Nice and easily identifiable? (which kind of lends to my thought on wanting a gateway one) Daniel

Re: [Standards] Strictness of disco types

2008-03-06 Thread Daniel Henninger
/text and that seems fair. If you or anyone have other thoughts on this though, I'd love to hear them. Daniel - Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Henninger wrote: http://www.xmpp.org/registrar/disco-categories.html#conference So there are two types listed. text and irc

Re: [Standards] XEP-0225: Multiple Connections Per JID?

2008-02-08 Thread Daniel Henninger
now that they're starting to branch out from more than just IM gateways. Are you planning on doing a draft about these concepts that I should keep an eye out for? ;D Daniel

Re: [Standards] XEP-0225: Multiple Connections Per JID?

2008-02-08 Thread Daniel Henninger
- Peter Saint-Andre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Daniel Henninger wrote: Anyway, am I reading this right as resources seem to be the way to go, even if it might require some folk to rethink how they're using/referencing components? Yes, I think XEP-0225 will require a significant

[Standards] XEP-0225: Multiple Connections Per JID?

2008-01-23 Thread Daniel Henninger
things knowing that there couldn't be a conflict. Thoughts? Daniel

Re: [Standards] IMML

2007-08-17 Thread Daniel Noll
into the clipboard (at least that's the experience I get with using Firefox and copying rp elements which are typically hidden) so it won't destroy the code. Daniel pgpMrrMxg6q4N.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Standards] how to treat invalid XMPP?

2007-07-19 Thread Daniel Noll
like the DTD up-front is easy enough. Ignoring comments and PIs comes free with the library. So I'm not sure it's hell. What would be hell is if you needed to quote the character outside of attribute values. Daniel pgpn1P5vctCeW.pgp Description: PGP signature

[Standards] Generic name attribute for XEP-0147

2007-07-09 Thread Daniel Aleksandersen
. It is so similar to roster, only with added status subscription... PS: Above URIs may brake up into multiple lines, due to email formatting done by my email client. -- Daniel Aleksandersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Getting a User's Attention

2007-07-06 Thread Daniel Noll
dropping the packet, I'm not sure. I think I would prefer the third option, the sender getting a not-authorized error back. Daniel pgpmIhloIvzBa.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Standards] XEP-0108: registry?

2007-07-06 Thread Daniel Noll
will suggest doing both. Set activity to on the phone and status to dnd. That's more specific than doing either independently, and doesn't even require inventing a new type of phone which may not even add any useful information to the other user. Daniel pgpy1fhx1BcxZ.pgp Description: PGP

Re: [Standards] XEP-0115 is harmful and should be deferred

2007-07-06 Thread Daniel Noll
On Saturday 07 July 2007 02:04, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Daniel Noll wrote: On Friday 06 July 2007 09:00, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Robin Redeker wrote: And I think announcing capabilities seems to be a great application of PEP/PubSub. I can already imagine the client setting: PEP

Re: [Standards] XEP-0115 is harmful and should be deferred

2007-07-06 Thread Daniel Noll
On Friday 06 July 2007 22:19, Kevin Smith wrote: On 6 Jul 2007, at 13:06, Daniel Noll wrote: But mobile client users and authors are still going to object to receiving data they didn't ask for, especially if it's the same size as what was already being sent in the presence. :-) Remember

Re: [Standards] Proposed XMPP Extension: Getting a User's Attention

2007-07-06 Thread Daniel Noll
claimed to support the feature, and for some reason they don't get prodded. On the other hand you can solve the same problem by telling some users you support it and other users you don't. So those other users don't even get the button in the first place. Daniel pgpsZRDr7lo3U.pgp Description

Re: [Standards] XEP-0108: registry?

2007-07-04 Thread Daniel Noll
Daniel Noll wrote: doesn't really matter to me. They're all phones. If I'm on an audio call, I might be able to IM with you in the background without the other person knowing. But I can't very well get away with that on a video call. So I think the distinction provides useful information

<    1   2   3   4   5   6