5 12:35 AM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 minor enhancement
On 03.06.2015 01:48, John Williams (johnwi3) wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Hum,.. not sure how useful this is, since a lot of stanzas are of little long
> term interest (eg: chatstates), but as
Behalf Of Matthew Wild
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 3:24 PM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] XEP-0198 minor enhancement
On 2 June 2015 at 22:11, John Williams (johnwi3) wrote:
> Jock> Dave, could you provide some clarification on the use cases,
> Jock> and what
> t
Comments inline
== John (Jock) Williams ==
From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Dave Cridland
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 1:01 PM
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: [Standards] XEP-0198 minor enhancement
What if, on a resumption failure, a server could include the 'h' attribu
> -Original Message-
> From: Standards [mailto:standards-boun...@xmpp.org] On Behalf Of Georg
> Lukas
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 2:46 PM
> To: standards@xmpp.org
> Subject: Re: [Standards] Security consideration for XEP-0198
>
> * Dave Cridland [2014-05-07 23:05]:
> > It's probably
