Re: [Standards] XEP-0138: security considerations

2014-04-25 Thread SM
on compression and setting defaults to avoid high resource consumption. Shouldn't that be addressed at the TLS level as it provides the functionality, with a relevant pointer in XEP-0138 so that the warning is not overlooked? Regards, -sm

Re: [Standards] Discussion venue Re: e2e privacy for XMPP Re: RFC 3923 (e2e with S/MIME) and OpenPGP

2013-11-25 Thread SM
line, the question is what are the properties of, for example, Tor and how does it relate to the topic. Regards, -sm

[Standards] XMPP Standards Foundation and XEP-0001

2013-09-21 Thread SM
. Is XSF still operational and if so, is there any requirement for it to operate in a transparent manner? Regards, -sm

Re: [Standards] XMPP Standards Foundation and XEP-0001

2013-09-21 Thread SM
accessible reports. On an unrelated note, I was puzzled when I could not find any comment from the XSF Board about a matter which is directly related to the primary mission in light of current events (see http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg82679.html ). Regards, -sm