On 1/14/10 7:49 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
On 1/14/10 5:27 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Thu Jan 14 04:16:05 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
* Clarified that the Editor is the canonical target for all
submissions, not necessarily all questions related to the XSF's
standards process.
We
I'm going to respond to this here, because I think it's got some
impact to the wider XMPP standards community. (Although I would
encourage you to join the XSF formally if you haven't).
On Thu Jan 14 04:16:05 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
* Changed the period for Council objections to
On 1/14/10 5:27 AM, Dave Cridland wrote:
I'm going to respond to this here, because I think it's got some impact
to the wider XMPP standards community. (Although I would encourage you
to join the XSF formally if you haven't).
On Thu Jan 14 04:16:05 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
*
On Thu Jan 14 14:49:12 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
We AIM to please!
Surely we XMPP to please?
Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:d...@cridland.net - xmpp:d...@dave.cridland.net
- acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
- http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP,
On 1/14/2010 10:57 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:
On Thu Jan 14 14:49:12 2010, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
We AIM to please!
Surely we XMPP to please?
Dave.
Oh, would you two please stop jabber-ing...
Brett
FYI.
Original Message
Subject: [Members] proposed changes to XEP-0001
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:15:17 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im
Reply-To: XSF Members memb...@xmpp.org
To: XSF Members memb...@xmpp.org
Several months ago I reviewed XEP-0001 and noted some
