Hello Takuki
Thanks for your input.
I'm trying to see to which extent an ordering of enumeration or boolean options
has any meaning.
My first observation is that the default values of the options must be
supported by the server. They could be seen as "easier". Furthermore, they are
all "false
Peter,
(2013/03/20 7:06), Peter Waher wrote:
What EXI options should we require the XMPP server to support (MUST)? If
we could agree on a set of options the server must implement we can make
the negotiation simpler, and clients can assume these options to be
supported.
I'd rather like to limi
Subject: RE: [Standards] Proposal for including EXI in XMPP
Dear Randy
Constrained here, apart from the normal English definition, could mean any
reason why they would not otherwise be able to use XMPP as a transport protocol.
One constraint could be allowable packet size. Wireless sensor
compression is used.
Sincerely,
Peter Waher
-Original Message-
From: Randy Turner [mailto:rtur...@amalfisystems.com]
Sent: den 15 mars 2013 12:08
To: XMPP Standards
Cc: public-...@w3.org
Subject: Re: [Standards] Proposal for including EXI in XMPP
I was curious what the definition of
Dear Randy,
From: Randy Turner
Subject: Re: [Standards] Proposal for including EXI in XMPP
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 08:08:25 -0700
> I was curious what the definition of "constrained" is ?
You're right. Full-spec EXI does require certain amount of codes, but
one can imple
I was curious what the definition of "constrained" is ?
EXI does produce a compact representation of XML (which is good if
"constrained" is meant to apply to the amount of any output XML representation)
But I think the executable code size of an EXI implementation might not be
appropriate fo
Dear folks,
As Peter mentioned, I believe XMPP and EXI should be a good oppotunity
for both parties to make Internet-of-Things with good richness of data
representation (i.e. end-to-end XML datamodel), responsiveness (i.e.
XMPP IM/PubSub), and integration to real-world use cases (i.e.
integra
Hello John,
Thanks for your mail. It sounds like very interesting projects you're working
with. I would be happy to hear your thoughts, ideas, visions and comments
regarding this. I'll also make sure I include you in any discussions regarding
EXI.
Sincerely,
Peter Waher
From: John Schneider [
We are in our projects using www.contiki-os.org/ created by www.sics.se and
constrained nodes and the aim is to use EXI and XMPP over IPv6 according to
the new XEP's with Sensor Networks.
/Joachim
2013/3/15 Peter Saint-Andre
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 3/14/13 6:50
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/14/13 6:50 PM, John Schneider wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Its really great to see some momentum on this! Thanks very much for
> the energy you are putting into it. This is something in which I've
> had a long-running interest. In fact, I think Peter and
10 matches
Mail list logo
