On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:40 PM Andrew Nenakhov
wrote:
>
> Well, on the other hand, since the only scenario I can imagine using
> in the wild has significantly different semantics from
> readdisplayed markers, I think that this is not really necessary in this XEP.
The part I was considering
Well, on the other hand, since the only scenario I can imagine using
in the wild has significantly different semantics from
readdisplayed
markers, I think that this is not really necessary in this XEP.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2024 at 17:34, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Dave
On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 1:11 PM Dave Cridland wrote:
> 3) It's really not. Some clients and intermediaries need to know whether they
> should expect a marker or not. No need to check this prior to sending a
> , true, but useful to track missing markers afterward.
>
> Where was the discussion
As I said earlier, some day down the road can actually be
useful:
> But I could see this feature useful for something like voice/video
messages to indicate that it has been played by the recipient. At least,
Telegram does have such feature (not in group chats though, there it makes
no sense and
I entirely missed this, and have no understanding of the rationale, but:
1) I'm somewhat ambivalent about removing , but it's certainly
well implemented by my anecdotological studies.
2) Removing seems OK, but I've considered various use-cases
for which an explicit, user-driven, acknowledgement
