On 20 Feb 2017, at 16:12, Steve Kille wrote:
>> Clients are going to need to use a consistent approach to globally unique
>> naming. If they’re not unique then you’ll get collisions and all the
>> benefits are
>> lost. (And if they’re not consistent then they’ll be fingerprintable, which
>> seems
> Clients are going to need to use a consistent approach to globally unique
> naming. If they’re not unique then you’ll get collisions and all the benefits
> are
> lost. (And if they’re not consistent then they’ll be fingerprintable, which
> seems like a sensible thing to avoid while we’ve got t
On 20.02.2017 14:12, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 12:42, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>
>> On 20.02.2017 12:54, Kevin Smith wrote:
>>> Hi Flow,
>>>
>>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:28, Florian Schmaus wrote:
On 20.02.2017 10:36, Georg Lukas wrote:
> * Jonas Wielicki [2017-02-20
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 12:42, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
> On 20.02.2017 12:54, Kevin Smith wrote:
>> Hi Flow,
>>
>> On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:28, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20.02.2017 10:36, Georg Lukas wrote:
* Jonas Wielicki [2017-02-20 10:20]:
> I feel that using BIND2 resources-
On 20.02.2017 12:54, Kevin Smith wrote:
> Hi Flow,
>
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:28, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>
>> On 20.02.2017 10:36, Georg Lukas wrote:
>>> * Jonas Wielicki [2017-02-20 10:20]:
I feel that using BIND2 resources---albeit this is likely to become the
new
standard---h
