> Clients are going to need to use a consistent approach to globally unique > naming. If they’re not unique then you’ll get collisions and all the benefits > are > lost. (And if they’re not consistent then they’ll be fingerprintable, which > seems like a sensible thing to avoid while we’ve got the chance).
[Steve Kille] Could this be usefully achieved with something more compact than a UUID4? The idea seems right, but UUID4s are very long Steve _______________________________________________ Standards mailing list Info: https://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/standards Unsubscribe: standards-unsubscr...@xmpp.org _______________________________________________
