On 2012-07-23 10:13, Kevin Smith wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Gunnar Hellström
wrote:
Yes, good to distinguish between service discovery, and activating support.
There is something missing in a sentence in version 0.4, chapter 5.
In order for an application to determine whether an e
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Gunnar Hellström
wrote:
> Yes, good to distinguish between service discovery, and activating support.
> There is something missing in a sentence in version 0.4, chapter 5.
> In order for an application to determine whether an entity supports this
> protocol, where
(Peter, please go ahead and proceed to publish 0.5 I submitted ASAP -- so
that people have context when reading this. Fixes can go into 0.6, if
deemed important)
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Gunnar Hellström <
gunnar.hellst...@omnitor.se> wrote:
> 11. Section 4.1, Example 1, Line 9 , make
On 2012-07-22 03:19, Mark Rejhon wrote:
Hello XSF members (Peter and Kevin, et cetra)
I incorporated Gunnar's edit today. Do you prefer I submit an 0.5
immediately before you review? The only changes I did were editorial
-- word edits, phrase edits and sentence edits/moves, in approximately
On 7/21/12 7:19 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> Hello XSF members (Peter and Kevin, et cetra)
>
> I incorporated Gunnar's edit today. Do you prefer I submit an 0.5
> immediately before you review? The only changes I did were editorial --
> word edits, phrase edits and sentence edits/moves, in approxima
Hello XSF members (Peter and Kevin, et cetra)
I incorporated Gunnar's edit today. Do you prefer I submit an 0.5
immediately before you review? The only changes I did were editorial --
word edits, phrase edits and sentence edits/moves, in approximately 15
locations, no protocol changes over 0.4.
On 7/21/12 9:01 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote:
>> Can someone else outside the R3TF also comment about the inclusion of a
>> small TTY/textphone paragraph in Interoperability considerations? (Yea's
>> and Nay's -- I know I've gotten a couple of Nay's
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Mark Rejhon wrote:
> Can someone else outside the R3TF also comment about the inclusion of a
> small TTY/textphone paragraph in Interoperability considerations? (Yea's
> and Nay's -- I know I've gotten a couple of Nay's already.)
It's an XMPP extension - I'm not
*On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Edward Tie wrote:
*
>
> *I missed some articles at Capther 8
> *8. Interoperability Considerations
> I missed some articles about Captional telephone (SMS) and classic text
> telephones (V.18 and V.22 bis) .
> Can you explain why do you not added a sub articl
I missed some articles at Capther 8
8. Interoperability Considerations
I missed some articles about Captional telephone (SMS) and classic
text telephones (V.18 and V.22 bis) .
Can you explain why do you not added a sub article about a gateway
to classic textphones and Capatio
Sending reply that covered the bullets.
Also, some of this is already outdated, as I already made some changes
(independently). You might want to review which bullets still apply, and
which bullets are outdated.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Rejhon
Date: Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Gunnar Hellström <
gunnar.hellst...@omnitor.se> wrote:
> That was a huge amount of edits.
>
According to Einstien: "It's all relative"
Compare the 0.2-0.3 diff and the 0.3-0.4 diff.
You'll notice that the 0.2-0.3 diff is impossible to track, while the
0.3-0.4 di
On 2012-07-21 04:55, Mark Rejhon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:33 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor
mailto:edi...@xmpp.org>> wrote:
Version 0.4 of XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) has been released.
Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted
in-band over an XMPP s
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:33 PM, XMPP Extensions Editor wrote:
> Version 0.4 of XEP-0301 (In-Band Real Time Text) has been released.
> Abstract: This is a specification for real-time text transmitted in-band
> over an XMPP session.
> Changelog: Spelling, grammar, and clarification edits, including
14 matches
Mail list logo
