Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

2016-02-04 Thread Goffi
Le mercredi 3 février 2016, 10:47:45 Stephen Paul Weber a écrit : > > But I have to say that MAM is really badly adapted to PubSub > > I'm curious why one would *want* to use MAM with PubSub, since PubSub > already specifies a way of storing and fetching items? For the filtering capabilities (i.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

2016-02-03 Thread Stephen Paul Weber
But I have to say that MAM is really badly adapted to PubSub I'm curious why one would *want* to use MAM with PubSub, since PubSub already specifies a way of storing and fetching items? -- Stephen Paul Weber, @singpolyma See for how I prefer to be contacted edition rig

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

2016-01-27 Thread Goffi
Hi Kev, thanks for your answer, I put a few notes here so we can talk about it if needed tomorrow. Le dimanche 24 janvier 2016, 17:25:44 Kevin Smith a écrit : > On 6 Jan 2016, at 11:08, Goffi wrote: > > - All items a returned in separate stanza, wrapped in a > > element, one item per stanza.

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

2016-01-24 Thread Kevin Smith
On 6 Jan 2016, at 11:08, Goffi wrote: > - All items a returned in separate stanza, wrapped in a > element, one item per stanza. This both is a waste of bandwidth and make the > task more difficult for the client as it must track each and the > > result to known when a page has been receive

Re: [Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

2016-01-06 Thread Jefry Lagrange
Hello, I think it is a good idea for there to be a search extension for pubsub. One thing to keep in mind would be is that the extension could become really complicated depending on the search fields that you are going to have and the type of filter you want. If there are user defined fields,

[Standards] XEP-0313: why it is *really* not a good idea to use MAM with Pubsub

2016-01-06 Thread Goffi
G'day, MAM is a great tool which solves several problems for messages management. It also offers the ability to get items from a PubSub node when the "node" attribute is used. We have implemented this feature in our PubSub/PEP component, and I haven't seen any other implementation for PubSub s