Thu, 12 Apr 2018 23:47:09 +
Tedd Sterr wrote:
> Isn't this the point of the CFE - to find out?
> There is always the *possibility* that somebody somewhere could
> possibly maybe have implemented a given feature, but if nobody knows
> about it, do we just assume it does anyway? In which case,
On 4/12/18 5:47 PM, Tedd Sterr wrote:
>> But we might never know if someone is building an application or service
>> on top of a library...
>
> Isn't this the point of the CFE - to find out?
> There is always the **possibility** that somebody somewhere could
> possibly maybe have implemented a giv
> But we might never know if someone is building an application or service
> on top of a library...
Isn't this the point of the CFE - to find out?
There is always the *possibility* that somebody somewhere could possibly maybe
have implemented a given feature, but if nobody knows about it, do we j
On 12 April 2018 at 22:58, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, at 16:41, Christian Schudt wrote:
> > here some implementation for XEP 131 and 141 because you said „doesn’t
> > have enough implementation“.
>
> In general I think "implementations" is meant to read "clients or
> applications",
On 4/12/18 3:58 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, at 16:41, Christian Schudt wrote:
>> here some implementation for XEP 131 and 141 because you said „doesn’t
>> have enough implementation“.
>
> In general I think "implementations" is meant to read "clients or
> applications", here. I
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, at 16:41, Christian Schudt wrote:
> here some implementation for XEP 131 and 141 because you said „doesn’t
> have enough implementation“.
In general I think "implementations" is meant to read "clients or
applications", here. If something is implemented in a library (or seve
Hi,
here some implementation for XEP 131 and 141 because you said „doesn’t have
enough implementation“.
=> XEP-0001 requirement (at least two implementations) is fulfilled.
— Christian
> 4) Advance to Final XEP-0131: Stanza Headers and Internet Metadata -
> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-01
http://logs.xmpp.org/council/2018-04-11/#15:01:53
1) Roll Call
Present: Kev, Dave, Daniel, Georg, Sam
2) Agenda Bashing
Dave apologises for not managing to do an agenda this week, and quickly makes
something up: two CFEs, Kev's IM-NG protoXEP, and...
Jonas mentions the GC-1.0 abolishment vote (r
