On Jan 8, 2014, at 12:56 AM, Fedor Brunner wrote:
> Signed PGP part
> Hi,
> is there a XMPP client/library implementing [draft-miller] ?
>
I know there are implementations out there, but I don't recall who exactly has
done it.
I've done some personal prototypes, but I'm not obliged to share
Hi,
On 2014-01-09 05:55, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> To me, the only things that OTR doesn't currently solve are:
>
> 1. Multiple devices
> 2. Encryption of complete stanzas
also:
3. Offline messages.
--
Kim "Zash" Alvefur
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I'm inclined to agree; I think a good first step would be documenting how
we do OTR currently in XMPP. My understanding from Emil Ivov was that there
were a couple of edge cases that need consideration.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Peter,
I want to solve the encryption of text messages, VoIP, and File
Transfers. XTLS allows to secure all of this, text messages(with
XEP-0247), Jingle File Transfers, VoIP (with SRTP, or DTLS-SRTP or
ZRTP-SRTP, XEP-0167, XEP-0262, XEP-0320).
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/08/2014 12:56 AM, Fedor Brunner wrote:
> Hi, is there a XMPP client/library implementing [draft-miller] ?
Not that I know of. Matt Miller implemented it in some private code of
his, but nothing public as far as I know.
> When comparing [draft-m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
is there a XMPP client/library implementing [draft-miller] ?
When comparing [draft-miller] with XTLS, I think XTLS is simpler and
could be implemented using existing TLS libraries. TLS doesn't support
encryption of offline messages, but for offl
Hi,
On 27.12.2013 13:11, Fedor Brunner wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm comparing the documents
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-02.html
>
> in the
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html
> the digest algorithm for X.509
Hi,
On 2013-12-27 13:11, Fedor Brunner wrote:
> I'm comparing the documents
> http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html
> https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-02.html
Maybe it/they should be using [XEP-0300], which I don't think were
around when those documents were w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'm comparing the documents
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html
https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-meyer-xmpp-e2e-encryption-02.html
in the
http://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/jingle-xtls.html
the digest algorithm for X.509 certificate