Re: [Standards] urn:xmpp:hashes:2

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Christian Schudt wrote: > The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly mentions the > base64 encoding, but I think it was clear enough before (due to samples). > Is that worth a namespace bump? Are there any

[Standards] urn:xmpp:hashes:2

Hi, what exactly was the reason for a namespace bump for urn:xmpp:hashes:1 => urn:xmpp:hashes:2 ? I couldn’t find any discussion about it in the Last Call [1], nor do I see any real difference to the previous version 0.4 [2]. The only difference I see is, that the document now explicitly