On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 16:39, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 6/3/20 10:50 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:> That said, I think there's two
> useful things we can do here:
> >
> > 1) Validation information is clearly useful in this case; we should add
> > that to the XEP-0068 registry by an update to XEP-006
On 6/3/20 10:50 PM, Dave Cridland wrote:> That said, I think there's two
useful things we can do here:
>
> 1) Validation information is clearly useful in this case; we should add
> that to the XEP-0068 registry by an update to XEP-0068
I would like to avoid steering us in a world where we are re
On 6/3/20 5:25 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote:> Hi everyone,
>
> Flow and I got in a discussion about whether it is OK to add foreign,
> namespaced elements to Registry entries.
I think registry entries should be just as extensible as the elements
that are registered. This would also align nicely with th
On Mittwoch, 3. Juni 2020 22:50:26 CEST Dave Cridland wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 16:30, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > Flow and I got in a discussion about whether it is OK to add foreign,
> > namespaced elements to Registry entries.
> >
> > I’m not sold to either side, I was
On Wed, 3 Jun 2020 at 16:30, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Flow and I got in a discussion about whether it is OK to add foreign,
> namespaced elements to Registry entries.
>
> I’m not sold to either side, I was just curiously wondering if there’s
> precedent and if it’s considered a goo
