Re: [Standards] XEP-0384 and inbox/omemo-filetransfer: Variable length of MAC

2016-12-13 Thread Andrey Gursky
Hi all, hi Goffi, On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 10:42:14 +0100 Goffi wrote: > Hello, > > Le dimanche 11 décembre 2016, 21:40:19 CET Andrey Gursky a écrit : > > Are there any major technical issues with omemo filetransfer that you > > couldn't solve? Can't they be solved in general or it can be discussed?

Re: [Standards] XEP-0384 and inbox/omemo-filetransfer: Variable length of MAC

2016-12-12 Thread Goffi
Hello, Le dimanche 11 décembre 2016, 21:40:19 CET Andrey Gursky a écrit : > Are there any major technical issues with omemo filetransfer that you > couldn't solve? Can't they be solved in general or it can be discussed? > Are you working on a successor XEP or if I'd need it I'd had to go on my >

Re: [Standards] XEP-0384 and inbox/omemo-filetransfer: Variable length of MAC

2016-12-11 Thread Andrey Gursky
Daniel, On Sun, 11 Dec 2016 19:45:47 +0100 Daniel Gultsch wrote: > On Dec 11, 2016 7:07 PM, "Andrey Gursky" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > The 16 bytes key and the GCM authentication tag (The tag SHOULD have at > > > least 128 bit) are concatenated and for each intended

Re: [Standards] XEP-0384 and inbox/omemo-filetransfer: Variable length of MAC

2016-12-11 Thread Daniel Gultsch
Omemo filetransfer has been rejected by Council due to a retraction by the author. (me) The file transfer xep hasn't been updated after that particular change was made in the omemo xep. On Dec 11, 2016 7:07 PM, "Andrey Gursky" wrote: > Hi, > > > The 16 bytes key and