Re: [PATCH] clean up unused variable warnings in new list tests

2007-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 6:22 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] clean up unused variable warnings in new list tests This looks good to me Mark but let's wait for Fari

Re: [PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC

2007-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
This looks familiar. Didn't I already review this patch? [...searching archives...] I see you original patch in our archive (http://tinyurl.com/ywxq9w) but I can't find my reply there. I was able to find it here though: http://www.mail-archive.com/stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg02760.html b

RE: problems with new list tests

2007-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 19:33 +0300, Farid Zaripov wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:12 PM > > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: problems with new list tests > > > > I've been working on cleani

RE: problems with new list tests

2007-03-28 Thread Farid Zaripov
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 7:12 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: problems with new list tests > > I've been working on cleaning up our test results across the > board with the hope of stabilizin

Re: Boost: roguewave.hpp (repost)

2007-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:40 +0300, Farid Zaripov wrote: > I forgot to switch to the Mozilla Thunderbird to send the letter with > attachment, so I repost. > > The boost library have the configuration header file > boost/config/stdlib/roguewave.hpp (attached). > > That header file always i

problems with new list tests

2007-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
I've been working on cleaning up our test results across the board with the hope of stabilizing things enough to cut a preliminary 4.2 [pre]release branch sometime soon. Last night's results contain a number of new failures on several platforms introduced by the just committed list tests. I'd like

[PATCH] dynatype.cpp example and MSVC

2007-03-28 Thread Farid Zaripov
Attached is a patch for the dynatype example to get compiled on MSVC 7.1 and MSVC 8.0. Farid. Index: dynatype.cpp === --- dynatype.cpp(revision 522931) +++ dynatype.cpp(working copy) @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ * * dynatyp

RE: legacy tests on Windows

2007-03-28 Thread Farid Zaripov
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 3:50 AM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: legacy tests on Windows > > Farid, if this is a simple enough change could you look into > it sometime soon? Otherwise, if you'

Boost: roguewave.hpp (repost)

2007-03-28 Thread Farid Zaripov
I forgot to switch to the Mozilla Thunderbird to send the letter with attachment, so I repost. The boost library have the configuration header file boost/config/stdlib/roguewave.hpp (attached). That header file always included when building boost with stdcxx, so I think we can use that fi

RE: [PATCH] clean up unused variable warnings in new list tests

2007-03-28 Thread Farid Zaripov
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 6:22 PM > To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] clean up unused variable warnings in new > list tests > > This looks good to me Mark but let's wait for Farid to revi

Boost: roguewave.hpp

2007-03-28 Thread Farid Zaripov
The boost library have the configuration header file boost/config/stdlib/roguewave.hpp (attached). That header file always included when building boost with stdcxx, so I think we can use that file to configure the boost for successful compiling. Farid.

Re: [PATCH] clean up unused variable warnings in new list tests

2007-03-28 Thread Martin Sebor
This looks good to me Mark but let's wait for Farid to review it. If he's happy with go ahead and commit it. Martin On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:00 -0800, Mark Brown wrote: > I just noticed the new list tests that went in today -- they look like a lot > of work! -- and started going through them to