Platforms) wrote:
Thank you, Harold!
Where can I get the code? We would like to set it up!
Serge.
-Original Message-
From: Harold Carr [mailto:harold.c...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 1:38 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Akopov, Sergei (GE Intelligent Platforms
General Session: Software + Services: The Next
Application Platform
(although it doesn't seem to play for me now - it has in the past).
Regards,
Harold Carr, Ph.D.
Web Services Architect, Oracle
Yes, great work everyone!
On 11/15/10 2:19 PM, Dewey, Ben wrote:
I was purposely sitting on Kamal's email in hopes that we would receive some
comment from the folks on the WSO2 or Java side of the equation, unfortunately
I haven't heard anything.
Despite my desire to continue, without
: M2
Reporter: Harold Carr
Fix For: M2
The architecture document for claims-based-security is attached to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harold Carr updated STONEHENGE-100:
---
Attachment: stonehengeWithCBS.zip
Metro-based claims-based-security implementation
Hello Ben,
I think METRO_* and WSAS_* would be correct.
Definitely there should not be a JAVA_* at this point, particulary since there
are other JAVA stacks besides Metro and WSAS.
Regards,
Harold
Ben Dewey wrote:
There seems to be a conflict in the service names between METRO and WSAS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-90?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harold Carr updated STONEHENGE-90:
--
Attachment: MetroWithJSFUIAndBasicConfigService.zip
the updated patch with images
Update
I agree that it would be good to have a M1 (or whatever it is called) that has
the latest greatest stuff - but does NOT have STS.
Regards,
H
Scott Golightly wrote:
It is my intention that we continue to use the configuration system
(although when I started to incorporate it the feature wasn't
Hello Kent,
I agree on the M1 freeze then a M2 version also.
It would be good to encourage new stacks to do both versions.
Thanks,
H
Kent Brown wrote:
This is a very important thing for us to get consensus on.
I see value in the option Harold suggests of making things configurable so
To give demos and to increase confidence that things are configured correctly it
would be great to have each page in the UI have BS powered by and OPS
powered by icons.
These icons would be retrieved from the web services themselves:
UI - bs.getBSIcon()
UI - bs.getOPSIcon() -
I understand that the StockTrader is moving towards claim-based identity, with
that identity provided by a service (e.g., Metro STS framework, Geneva
Framework). Definitely a good idea.
However, it would be good to keep the existing version of Stonehenge (I assume
it uses mutual certs?)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-78?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12731174#action_12731174
]
Harold Carr commented on STONEHENGE-78:
---
Rather than depend of the config service
Hello Ben,
Great (and I apologize for not be able to listen in on the mailing list in
detail to have seen this).
I just updated the bug with my suggestion:
These icons would be retrieved from the web services themselves:
UI - bs.getBSIcon()
UI - bs.getOPSIcon() - ops.getOPSIcon
Each
Ben Dewey wrote:
Also wasn't trying to be offensive just wanted to point out that we have the
go-ahead.
I did not take it as offensive. But thanks for the clarification - always good
to be explicit in email.
Thanks,
H
Hello Ben,
The Metro version only depends on Ant. It would be good not to increase the
dependencies.
Regarding someone working on the download target: I'll bring this up with the
team working on the metro version.
Thanks,
Harold
Ben Dewey wrote:
Harold,
Were you thinking of using
Scott Golightly wrote:
The first and most fundamental question is if we want the identity providers to
be interchangeable or interoperable.
YES to both.
We could probably build two initial identity providers:
- one using the Metro STS framework
- one using the Geneva framework
Hopefully
Hello Ming Jin,
In addition to the refactoring in my former message, we are trying to share
DAL between BS and OP for metro version. But we do not want to check the
generated code into repository as WSO2 code did.
Definitely, for the Metro version we do NOT want to check in generated code.
Hello Ben,
I apologize for the delay. I have been traveling most of the month of June.
It would be good to have a build.xml target for downloading the jars. That
target should not be depended on by the build. It should just be a standalone
target. Then the instructions should be updated
+1
Ben Dewey wrote:
I only had the x64 version of jdk installed, the glassfish install required
32bit jdk to install.
Do the GlassFish install docs point that out?
H
Hello all,
I am busy with JavaOne this week so will not have time to respond to any
requested changes this week. Thanks for getting it into contrib. Nice to be
part of the project.
Thanks,
H
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harold Carr updated STONEHENGE-69:
--
Attachment: metroaa
Source code for initial version of Metro-based stocktrader - a zip file
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harold Carr updated STONEHENGE-69:
--
Attachment: metroac
Initial Metro-based version of StockTrader sample application
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-69?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Harold Carr updated STONEHENGE-69:
--
Attachment: metroad
Initial Metro-based version of StockTrader sample application
Hello all,
I am Harold Carr, the architect of the Metro web services stack at
Sun. We have been working on a Metro-based version of the Stonehenge
StockTrader sample application. I am excited to announce that I have
just uploaded the initial Metro-based version of the code:
https
Hello Drew,
http://bashcurescancer.com/merging_split_files.html
Regards,
Harold
Hello all,
There seems to be much activity in the codebase over the last two weeks. We are
still in the process of trying to create and populate the database. The last
set of steps we have are from Scott Golightly on April 6:
Here are the steps that I used to create the database
on my
Got it. Thanks, H
Drew Baird (Volt) wrote:
Hi Harold,
Yes! Definitely use trunk for EVERYTHING unless directed otherwise.
If Sun contributes code to Stonehenge it goes to contrib initially and is moved
to truck when we actually use it in the project. My guess contrib is really
there to
Hello Drew,
Congratulations! Do you have step-by-step instructions so others can duplicate
the work?
Thanks,
H
Drew Baird (Volt) wrote:
Hi Fello Stonehengers,
Our IVA Lab now has SIX StockTrader instances working. Special thanks to
Shankar and Dimuthu who patiently worked with us as we
MySQL hookup being done by Sun sounds reasonable. However, the interns (I know,
I need to connect some names here) are a long way off from being able to do that.
Regards,
Harold
Kamaljit Bath wrote:
+1
May be Harold/SUN folks can start off on this?
-Original Message-
From:
If there common config come into being, please keep it extremely lightweight and
simple. Recall the MS StockTrader docs: it is quite hard to distinguish the
actuall services from the infrastructure built up around those services. In
other words, please keep the focus on the services.
participate in that conversation to make sure its right.
Thanks,
Sanjiva.
Harold Carr wrote:
Hello Sanjiva and Michael,
Regarding the license: good to know we can adapt the code - that's
what I thought but it's best to be explicit in these things.
Regarding commit right: I personally do not have
Hello all,
We, the Metro team, are considering contributing a Metro-based version of the
StockTrader application. If we did this we would most likely start with the
Java version that is already in the Stonehenge codebase and adapt it to Metro.
Question:
- it seems the license will allow us
33 matches
Mail list logo
