RE: Ready to Graduate?

2010-10-20 Thread Scott Golightly
to say that I probably won't have time to do anything until mid-November towards furthering that goal. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Kamaljit Bath [mailto:kamaljit.b...@microsoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 11:00 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subjec

RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M2 Release (take4)

2010-06-30 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:chinta...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 12:58 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M2 Release (take4) On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Ben Dewey wrote: >

RE: [Vote] Grant committer status to Nicholas A Hauenstein

2010-06-08 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashan...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 4:29 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [Vote] Grant committer status to Nicholas A Hauenstein +1 Regards, Shankar On Sat, Jun 5

RE: [Vote] Grant committer status to Pablo Cibraro

2010-06-04 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 -Original Message- From: Kent Brown [mailto:kent.br...@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 1:08 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [Vote] Grant committer status to Pablo Cibraro +1 Kent Brown -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:ben.de...@2

[jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-121) Proposal for M3

2010-04-14 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12856938#action_12856938 ] Scott Golightly commented on STONEHENGE-121: In general I like the ide

Problems with the Stonehenge documentation

2010-04-12 Thread Scott Golightly
Over the weekend I have had problems getting to the installation documentation[1]. It appears that the cwiki site for Stonehenge is not responding. I was wondering if anyone else was seeing the problem and if so who should be notified? Scott Golightly [1] http://cwiki.apache.org

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-15) Protect connection strings in Business Services and Order Processor solutions

2009-11-09 Thread Scott Golightly
f personal preferences. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, November 09, 2009 2:03 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-15) Protect connection strings in Business Services and Order

RE: M2 test matrix

2009-10-27 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Kent Brown [mailto:kent.br...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:59 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: M2 test matrix Since there were no more suggestions, I'd like a vote that this is a sufficient

RE: Token returned by the .Net passive STS

2009-10-21 Thread Scott Golightly
When I put out the passive STS it was as a preview so we could work out these issues. Pablo suggested encrypting the tokens and I didn't see any dissenting discussions. My vote would be to encrypt the token unless there is a stack that cannot encrypt the token. Scott -Original Message- Fr

RE: Profile ID claim

2009-10-02 Thread Scott Golightly
data returned by the login method as claims in that > token). We don't really need the logout operation at all if we negotiate the > token with the active STS for every service call, or we cache that token > somewhere and we kill it when the user logout in the web application. > &

RE: Profile ID claim

2009-10-02 Thread Scott Golightly
hen by all means lets clean up the code by removing the login/logout UI and associated code. I did create GetProfileIdFromStsIdentifier method to return the profile id based on the issuing STS and the unique identifier provided by that STS. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-09-30 Thread Scott Golightly
ONEHENGE-73 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73 > > Project: Stonehenge > > Issue Type: New Feature > > Components: Documentation, DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_CLIENT, DOTNET_OPS, PHP_BS, > > PHP_CLIENT, PHP_OPS, WSAS_BS, WSAS_OPS > > Affects Versi

RE: Test cases to demonstrate interoperability

2009-09-24 Thread Scott Golightly
also call the same endpoint with my code to trace and understand what a correctly working sample looks like so I could then see what is different in my code. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Kent Brown [mailto:kent.br...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:50

RE: .NET Stocktrader

2009-09-08 Thread Scott Golightly
ASP.NET is listed as Installed. If not, click on Add Role Services and select ASP.NET under Application Development. The dependent services will also be selected. Click install and continue through the wizard to install ASP.NET. 3. Retest the default.aspx site to see if that fixes the problem.

RE: .NET Stocktrader

2009-09-08 Thread Scott Golightly
d continue through the wizard to install ASP.NET. 3. Retest the default.aspx site to see if that fixes the problem. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Vineet ghatge [mailto:vgh4us...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 11:23 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-09-03 Thread Scott Golightly
All of the Stonehenge stock trader applications >Reporter: Scott Golightly >Assignee: Scott Golightly > Attachments: Changes to Apache Stonehenge to Support Claims Based > Security.docx, Changes to Apache Stonehenge to Support Claims Based > Security.d

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-09-02 Thread Scott Golightly
re > Components: Documentation, DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_CLIENT, DOTNET_OPS, PHP_BS, PHP_CLIENT, PHP_OPS, WSAS_BS, WSAS_OPS > Affects Versions: M2 > Environment: All of the Stonehenge stock trader applications >Reporter: Scott Golightly >Assignee

[jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-09-02 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly updated STONEHENGE-73: -- Attachment: StonehengeIdentity-02-Sep-2009.zip Updated patch that contains changes

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-09-02 Thread Scott Golightly
business services and in the common files. I included the files but didn't get the readme correct. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Chintana Wilamuna (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 2:53 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject:

RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-08-31 Thread Scott Golightly
business_service\BusinessServiceContract directory in the .zip over the corresponding files in your Stonehenge implementation. If you have already done that then running BuildDotNet.cmd to rebuild the service should fix the problem. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Joby Abragan-Lee

[jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-08-29 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly updated STONEHENGE-73: -- Attachment: StonehengeIdentity-08-Aug-2009.zip This is a preliminary look at the

RE: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk

2009-08-25 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:ben.de...@26ny.com] Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 9:09 PM To: 'stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org' Subject: [VOTE] Move METRO from contrib to trunk I'd like to call a vote for moving METRO from contrib to tr

RE: Network Connecton Error

2009-08-25 Thread Scott Golightly
protocol for connecting > but if you use something like 127.0.0.1\SQLExpress for the machine name it > should use TCP/IP. > > Scott Golightly > > -Original Message- > From: prajwal.muralidh...@sun.com [mailto:prajwal.muralidh...@sun.com] > Sent: Monday, August

RE: Network Connecton Error

2009-08-24 Thread Scott Golightly
is no way with sqlcmd to force a particular protocol for connecting but if you use something like 127.0.0.1\SQLExpress for the machine name it should use TCP/IP. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: prajwal.muralidh...@sun.com [mailto:prajwal.muralidh...@sun.com] Sent: Monda

RE: Network Connecton Error

2009-08-24 Thread Scott Golightly
g SQL Server Services in the left hand panel and right click on the SQL server instance then choose restart from the menu). Scott Golightly From: prajwal.muralidh...@sun.com [mailto:prajwal.muralidh...@sun.com] Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:32 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org

RE: Proposal about setting configuration service url

2009-08-19 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 I agree that having only 1 place to change the configuration and having changes appear in all layers is a good idea. Scott Golightly > Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:23:35 +0800 > Subject: Proposal about setting configuration service url > From: skyai...@gmail.com > To: st

RE: Testers wanted for STONEHENGE-94 & 95

2009-07-30 Thread Scott Golightly
I tested it with SQL 2008 SQLExpress and after updating the entry in the DBCONFIG table it worked fine for me. -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:ben.de...@26ny.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 9:37 PM To: 'Stonehenge Development' Subject: Testers wanted for STONEHENGE-94 & 95

RE: [jira] Resolved: (STONEHENGE-94) Remove extra data load files from SetupActions

2009-07-30 Thread Scott Golightly
Ben, I was a little slow but I have tested it as well and it works for me. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:36 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Resolved: (STONEHENGE-94) Remove

RE: Suggestion: mutual certificates viz 3rd party identity

2009-07-30 Thread Scott Golightly
rrent changes without the need for a STS. This would give a stable implementation of the configuration system without having to use token based security. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Drew Baird [mailto:drew...@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 11:14 PM To: stoneheng

RE: [Vote] Grant committer status to Avantika

2009-07-29 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 Scott Golightly > From: michael.champ...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [Vote] Grant committer status to Avantika > Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:06:59 + > > +1, Avantika has done a great job. > > -Original Messag

RE: Suggestion: mutual certificates viz 3rd party identity

2009-07-20 Thread Scott Golightly
o wants to implement a version to do so and if we can also have endpoints for the current and at least N-1 version of the project hosted at the Apache foundation it could really lower the barrier for the interoperability testing. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: harold.c.

Passive STS database changes

2009-07-16 Thread Scott Golightly
cookie) a little clearer. With this table structure all STS implementations could use the same GUID to identify the user at the STS or each STS could come up with its own unique GUID and place that value in the StsUserId table. As long as there were no GUID colissions with different AccountID values then the code will work without problem. Please let me know if you have any comments or concerns about these database changes. Scott Golightly

RE: Suggestion: mutual certificates viz 3rd party identity

2009-07-15 Thread Scott Golightly
still think it would make the code harder to read. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: harold.c...@sun.com [mailto:harold.c...@sun.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:25 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Suggestion: mutual certificates viz 3rd party identity I under

RE: Claims based authentication

2009-07-07 Thread Scott Golightly
I have started on a Geneva Framework implementation. I will be traveling for the next week and don't know how much time I will have to complete it but I will get an implementation up as soon as I can. Scott Golightly > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 15:41:08 -0700 > From: harold.c

RE: Authorize WCF Services scripts

2009-07-07 Thread Scott Golightly
issue with having it become the recommended setup option. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 12:36:19 -0400 > Subject: RE: Authorize WCF Services scripts > > I experienced the Certificate error as well,

RE: Authorize WCF Services scripts

2009-07-07 Thread Scott Golightly
find the physical path to the certificate and PowerShell to set the permissions. I don't see FindCert on my machine so is the workaround to uninstall and reinstall the certificates? Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date:

RE: Authorize WCF Services scripts

2009-07-06 Thread Scott Golightly
ervation didn't work. I tried removing the reservation again and got errors about not finding the file so it does something but seems incomplete in the removing the reservation. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Mon, 6 Jul

RE: Claims based authentication

2009-07-02 Thread Scott Golightly
t we as a group want to do in the way of setup and then later on adding new accounts. Scott Golightly > From: kent.br...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Claims based authentication > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 20:30:05 + > > Hi Scott, &

Claims based authentication

2009-07-02 Thread Scott Golightly
and the claims contained in the tokens. Scott Golightly

[jira] Assigned: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-07-02 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly reassigned STONEHENGE-73: - Assignee: Scott Golightly > Change Stonehenge to use claims based secur

[jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-07-02 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly updated STONEHENGE-73: -- Attachment: Changes to Apache Stonehenge to Support Claims Based Security.pdf

RE: [Vote]: Hosting Stonehenge endpoints at Apache

2009-06-26 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 I don't know if this is feasible but I would like to see the current and 1 previous version of the released endpoints hosted. Even though we only have 1 released version now I would expect the URL to contain the version and the technology to be clear what is being connected to.

Jira 73 - Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-06-16 Thread Scott Golightly
so I can clear up any places where the proposal isn't clear and we can have a good discussion on the merits of the idea. Scott Golightly

[jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-06-16 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-73?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly updated STONEHENGE-73: -- Attachment: Changes to Apache Stonehenge to Support Claims Based Security.pdf

[jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-73) Change Stonehenge to use claims based security

2009-06-16 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
: Documentation, DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_CLIENT, DOTNET_OPS, PHP_BS, PHP_CLIENT, PHP_OPS, WSAS_BS, WSAS_OPS Affects Versions: M2 Environment: All of the Stonehenge stock trader applications Reporter: Scott Golightly I am proposing that we change the authentication and authorization

RE: WIKI Discussion Pages

2009-06-15 Thread Scott Golightly
the feature has been implemented and the documentation updated with the change. I don't know if that is the "correct" structure but it makes sense to me. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009

RE: [VOTE] Chintana Wilamuna as a committer

2009-06-12 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 > Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:04:34 +0530 > Subject: [VOTE] Chintana Wilamuna as a committer > From: uthaiyashan...@gmail.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > > I would like to propose Chintana Wilamuna as an Apache Stonehenge > committer. He has done a great job for the development

RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-66) Create a .NET Config Service

2009-06-12 Thread Scott Golightly
There is probably an already established precedence but my vote would be to only commit completed code. If I want to test the current code I can do so from the patch. Just my 2 cents. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-57) Remove the InProcess Mode from .NET

2009-06-12 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 Scott Golightly > From: a-dre...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:41:25 -0700 > Subject: RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-57) Remove the InProcess Mode from > .NET > > +1 > Drew > > _

RE: [VOTE] Grant committer status to Ben Dewey

2009-06-11 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 I think Ben deserves it > From: kamaljit.b...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Grant committer status to Ben Dewey > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:34:33 + > > I would like to start a formal vote to grant committer status to Ben Dewey. > This has

RE: Improving the usability of Stocktrader

2009-05-28 Thread Scott Golightly
confusion for people just starting working with WCF web services. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Chintana Wilamuna [mailto:chinta...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 7:27 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Improving the usability of Stocktrader On Wed

RE: [jira] Resolved: (STONEHENGE-63) Cleanup Dotnet Build Script

2009-05-26 Thread Scott Golightly
command window to run the RunServices.bat file to start the services. I would prefer that it not close the command window but I think that could be a M2 fix. Scott Golightly > From: a-dre...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:30

RE: Interoperability Failure: SslContextToken & WS-Policy

2009-05-21 Thread Scott Golightly
an the binding 'OpsClient_WsHttpBinding_MSec' is just for how > the client proxy in BS access the OPS with the binding? > > > On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Scott Golightly < > scott_goligh...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I am reading the descri

RE: Interoperability Failure: SslContextToken & WS-Policy

2009-05-21 Thread Scott Golightly
the OrderProcessorConsoleServiceHost directory. Scott Golightly > Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:07:04 +0800 > Subject: Interoperability Failure: SslContextToken & WS-Policy > From: skyai...@gmail.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > CC: kent.br...@microsoft.com; har

RE: M2 development

2009-05-18 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 > From: a-dre...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:17:10 -0700 > Subject: RE: M2 development > > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Abu Obeida Bakhach [mailto:abu.obe...@microsoft.com] > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 2:58 PM > To: stone

RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2)

2009-05-13 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 > From: kamaljit.b...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Stonehenge M1 Release (Take 2) > Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:05:20 + > > +1 for M1 release > > -Original Message- > From: Kent Brown [mailto:kent.br...@microsoft.com] > Sent:

RE: Reporting on month of April - due Wed May 13

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Golightly
Ben and Abu, Thank you for the pointers. I have faxed off the ICLA so now I will wait to see if I am added to the list. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:09:50 -0400 > Subject: RE: Reporting

RE: Reporting on month of April - due Wed May 13

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Golightly
willing to start the wiki discussion but I apparently do not have rights to add/edit the wiki. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Abu Obeida Bakhach [mailto:abu.obe...@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 5:38 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Reporting on month

RE: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts

2009-05-04 Thread Scott Golightly
messages would need to be removed. Scott Golightly > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:09:30 -0700 > From: j...@apache.org > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging > messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts > &g

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-50) Convert .mht ,pdf formats into .html

2009-05-04 Thread Scott Golightly
As I understand it the released code will have all of the implementations in one download so I think having just one README will be sufficient. > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:52:30 -0700 > From: j...@apache.org > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-50) C

[jira] Closed: (STONEHENGE-13) Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the order processor and business services is different

2009-04-29 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly closed STONEHENGE-13. - > Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the or

[jira] Resolved: (STONEHENGE-13) Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the order processor and business services is different

2009-04-29 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly resolved STONEHENGE-13. --- Resolution: Fixed Tested after v2 of the patch was applied to the source code

RE: Are we using the ASPNETDB.mdf?

2009-04-28 Thread Scott Golightly
Ben, Isn't ASPNETDB created when you enable certain features like the ASP.NET Membership provider that we are using for authentication. I don't know that we are actually making any calls into the database but it might be necessary for the membership provider to work correctly. Scott >

RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-39) Allow restart on .NET WCF Service Hosts

2009-04-27 Thread Scott Golightly
change > a mode for the ops. It’s a server only not a client. I can always add the > restarting feature, one possible reason I just realized is if we want to > change the DB user/password. > > > -Ben > > > > -Original Message- > From: Scott Golightly [mail

[jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-13) Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the order processor and business services is different

2009-04-27 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly updated STONEHENGE-13: -- Attachment: Stonehenge-13 v2.patch I am attaching an updated patch file that fixes

RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-39) Allow restart on .NET WCF Service Hosts

2009-04-27 Thread Scott Golightly
Ben, Can you explain why you think the business service needs to restart and the OPS does not need to restart? I am missing the reason for the need to restart the service and what you see as the differences between the two. Scott -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey (JIRA) [mailto:j...@a

RE: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-29) Remove Microsoft Logo from the .NET Trader site and Implement a consistent design with PHP

2009-04-24 Thread Scott Golightly
+1 I think the after looks really nice. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey (JIRA) [mailto:j...@apache.org] Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 10:51 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-29) Remove Microsoft Logo from the NET Trader

Default password for trade user in the database

2009-04-24 Thread Scott Golightly
ate the code/documents to match it. >From what I understand all implementations have now coded to 'yyy' as the >password so I vote that we keep it as 'yyy'. Scott Golightly

RE: Finalizing Release artifacts for M1

2009-04-23 Thread Scott Golightly
I might be missing something but if someone really wanted to go to the effort they could download just the WSAS or any other implementation from option 1 while having the convenience of getting them all so I would vote for option 1. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Selvaratnam

Stonehenge-13 JIRA

2009-04-22 Thread Scott Golightly
or if you are changing the password back to trade to get it to work. I certainly didn't mean to cause anyone extra work and I don't want to do it again if this has become a non-issue. Please let me know what you would like to have as the default database password. Scott Golightly

RE: Why there is so much data in StockTraderDB

2009-04-22 Thread Scott Golightly
th reducing the number of accounts to something more reasonable like 50 and only keeping the data in the other tables that directly relates to those accounts. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: chinta...@gmail.com [mailto:chinta...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chintana Wilamuna Sent: Wedn

RE: Error Sending to .NET OPS from PHP and WSAS

2009-04-21 Thread Scott Golightly
fault)? Also could someone comment on the MSEC support. Is this something that is planned but has not been implemented yet or is there a technical reason why this cannot be implemented? Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:ben.de...@26ny.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2

RE: [jira] Commented: (STONEHENGE-13) Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the order processor and business services is different

2009-04-21 Thread Scott Golightly
- > > > > Key: STONEHENGE-13 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-13 > > Project: Stonehenge > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Environment: .NET setup_utilities for SQL Server 2008 > >

RE: Error when running SetupActions.exe

2009-04-20 Thread Scott Golightly
s actively accessing the database. I haven't checked this scenario but it is possible that we are failing to drop the database but not catching the error correctly and stopping the install. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-dre...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thu

RE: Running .NET Business/Order Services from VS versus Command Line

2009-04-16 Thread Scott Golightly
h one begins with the start command. start "Order Processor" c:\StockTraderDemo\order_processor\bin\debug\trade.orderProcessorConsoleHost exe start "Business Service" c:\StockTraderDemo\business_service\bin\debug\trade.BusinessServiceConsole.e xe Scott Golightly -Original Mes

RE: .NET stocktrader; problem with order processor.

2009-04-16 Thread Scott Golightly
p SSL certificates and also with CardSpace. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-dre...@microsoft.com] Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 10:14 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: .NET stocktrader; problem with order processor. I did not do 2003. Tha

[jira] Resolved: (STONEHENGE-12) The current code in the .NET trunk fails to create the database

2009-04-15 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-12?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly resolved STONEHENGE-12. --- Resolution: Fixed > The current code in the .NET trunk fails to create

RE: [jira] Assigned: (STONEHENGE-15) Protect connection strings in Business Services and Order Processor solutions

2009-04-14 Thread Scott Golightly
ck in the changes. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ben Dewey [mailto:ben.de...@26ny.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 6:49 PM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] Assigned: (STONEHENGE-15) Protect connection strings in Business Services and Order Proc

RE: [jira] Assigned: (STONEHENGE-15) Protect connection strings in Business Services and Order Processor solutions

2009-04-14 Thread Scott Golightly
Since the services are running and interacting with the configuration files any changes would be contained completely inside the service and would not affect the ability to interchange front end client, business service, or order processing services. Scott Golightly -Original Message

RE: Running .NET Business/Order Services from VS versus Command Line

2009-04-14 Thread Scott Golightly
27;t think that should be a high priority task. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Drew Baird (Volt) [mailto:a-dre...@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:29 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: Running .NET Business/Order Services from VS versus Comman

[jira] Assigned: (STONEHENGE-15) Protect connection strings in Business Services and Order Processor solutions

2009-04-13 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-15?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly reassigned STONEHENGE-15: - Assignee: Scott Golightly > Protect connection strings in Business Servi

[jira] Updated: (STONEHENGE-13) Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the order processor and business services is different

2009-04-13 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly updated STONEHENGE-13: -- Attachment: Stonehenge-13.patch Changes the default password for the '

[jira] Assigned: (STONEHENGE-13) Synchronize the password in the database setup with the password in the order processor and business services is different

2009-04-13 Thread Scott Golightly (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-13?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Scott Golightly reassigned STONEHENGE-13: - Assignee: Scott Golightly > Synchronize the password in the database se

RE: How to create and populate DB

2009-04-10 Thread Scott Golightly
instructions that might be easier to follow since they have the correct paths listed for files that need to be run. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Vineet ghatge [mailto:vgh4us...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:12 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject

Questions about issues and group etiquette

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Golightly
erstand the process better, do the committers vote on a patch or is the opinion of a single committer sufficient? Scott Golightly

RE: Integrated Authentication for dotet SetupActions

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Golightly
level if desired. Scott Golightly > From: kent.br...@microsoft.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: Integrated Authentication for dotet SetupActions > Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 22:01:22 + > > Does forcing integrated security cause a problem if we h

RE: Integrated Authentication for dotet SetupActions

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Golightly
If it is just for the setup then I don't see a problem. It could simplify the setup as well since you wouldn't have to add the sa password to app.config but you would still need to verify/update dbserver value. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To

RE: Integrated Authentication for dotet SetupActions

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Golightly
I don't think we should change the application to use integrated authentication because that would prohibit some of the other implementations from calling the SQL Server database. Scott Golightly > From: ben.de...@26ny.com > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Thu, 9

RE: [VOTE] dotnet Site Redesign?

2009-04-09 Thread Scott Golightly
I vote D I like the look of all 3 designs but maybe just because I have been staring at the current UI for a while I feel it is fine. I agree that the UI could be cleaned up but do not feel there is anything that wrong with it. I don't have a strong opinion so if you have a design you like and wou

RE: How to create and populate DB

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Golightly
://www.microsoft.com/express/download/ [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ManageAttachments.jspa?id=12422400 Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Scott Golightly [mailto:scott_goligh...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:51 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org

RE: How to create and populate DB

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Golightly
he rest of the source code into that directory. The strings at the beginning of SetupActions.cs (as well as various hard coded values throughout the code) append to that base directory to find the correct path to the file. I will send out what I find on C# Express later. Scott Golightl

RE: .NET Business Service Solution Paths

2009-04-07 Thread Scott Golightly
:\StockTraderDemo\Setup\... should be replaced with c:\StockTraderDemo\setup_utilities\... and other appropriate directory changes. As for the database setup you can either run the setup out of the contrib tree or apply the patch that I just sent out to update the path statements in the setup. Scott

RE: How to create and populate DB

2009-04-06 Thread Scott Golightly
exe. This created the database and populated the tables for me. Scott Golightly -Original Message- From: Ranjitha V [mailto:ranjitha...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 7:43 AM To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: How to create and populate DB Hi Drew, In h