Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

-1 I guess I started this by marking the associated bug report invalid, and adding the comments I received privately from the original reporter. The reasons I am -1 on this are: 1) The attributes for which this has been suggested are not valid per the W3C standards. I do not believe that Struts

Re: TODO List: XmlMessageResources volunteer

As Mike mentioned, current work on MessageResources is happening in the Commons sandbox. The hope is that it will be promoted to a regular Commons project, and released there, so that Struts can refer to it, as it does to other Commons projects today. I added the XMLMessageResources implementatio

Re: Struts & Filters (Servlets 2.3)

Clóvis Yutaka Harada wrote: > > what about Interfaces and Adapters ? > Similar to how swing works. Yeah, that's pretty much how I was thinking... with more of an emphasis on extending the adapters instead of implementing the interfaces. After all, the goal of not having interfaces in the fir

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

I really think questions of "compliance" and "properness" are out of context in all truth. You get Html outside that of the struts tags... let's say... 96% of the markup are you're in the most free text you've ever seen in your life. You aint seen the fun of free markup until you've left off a

RE: TODO List: XmlMessageResources volunteer

Hi Mihai, Please check out the resources sub-folder of the jakarta-commons-sandbox project. I haven't been able to work on it, but there's an implementation of XmlMessageResources there that should (hopefully, eventually) make it into the jakarta-commons package. -Original Message- From

RE: Struts & Filters (Servlets 2.3)

what about Interfaces and Adapters ? Similar to how swing works. -Original Message- From: Paul Speed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 2:53 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Struts & Filters (Servlets 2.3) Ted Husted wrote: > [ snip ] > > So to

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

Can we let it ride for a week, to see what else comes up? I appreciate input from the developers, but we might want to also see what the other committers have to say. I also just thought of another one: "output" - since that is what we are really doing, outputting something into the body of t

Re: Struts & Filters (Servlets 2.3)

Ted Husted wrote: > [ snip ] > > So to start a Struts 2.0 list > > + Require Servlet 2.3 / JSP 1.2 > + Controller as Filter > + Tag extensions as add-ons to JSPTL > + PropertyEditor Support What do you envision using PropertyEditors for? > + Declarative exceptions handled by Controller > +

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Arron Bates wrote: > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 18:27:42 +1100 > From: Arron Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Freetext attribute for all tags... > > Idea... > > There was

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5342] New: - html:errors tag currently requires errors.header & errors.footer to be defined

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Re[2]: Freetext attribute for all tags...

I like literal out of the three listed. A static or staticText field would be the only other ideas I have for naming. David --- Oleg V Alexeev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Ted, > > So, votes for naming of free style attribute for > html tags - > > literal - 2 > freetext - 1.5 (already

Re[2]: Freetext attribute for all tags...

Hello Ted, So, votes for naming of free style attribute for html tags - literal - 2 freetext - 1.5 (already extst) custom - 1 Any other votes or variants? If nothing then it will became 'literal'. Monday, December 10, 2001, 2:02:01 PM, you wrote: TH> Is freetext all right with everyone, or

Re: Struts & Filters (Servlets 2.3)

"Whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger". "Whatever doesn't break my build, makes it stronger"... everything else in next ++ version. Arron. PS. In regards to populating multiple ActionForms. This is not an issue with... err... nested beans :p Ted Husted wrote: >I'd say that requirin

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

Also what has to be considered is not just the immediate name, but what it takes from the pool of names that can be better used in the future, and its clarity of what it does along side future names & functionality. I feel that verbatim and literal have more of a place possibly defining rules

Re: Struts & Filters (Servlets 2.3)

I'd say that requiring Servlet 2.3 / 1.2 would justify a major version increase, and so maybe we should start whiteboarding Struts 2.0 to use a Filter instead of a Servlet for the controller. Among others, one thing that just came up under the "would've and "should've" heading was handling excepti

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

[+1] literal - Original Message - From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 6:02 AM Subject: Re: Freetext attribute for all tags... > Is freetext all right with everyone, or should we use something like > >

RE: Freetext attribute for all tags...

I'd prefer "literal". "freetext" calls the notion of "do what you want", but it is of course "do what html wants". "custom" calls the notion of "you have to program this yourself", which isn't the case. And "verbatim" is a close second, but not as English as "literal" imho. Just my opinion tomK

Re[2]: Freetext attribute for all tags...

Hello Ted, [+1] 'custom' Monday, December 10, 2001, 2:02:01 PM, you wrote: TH> Is freetext all right with everyone, or should we use something like TH> literal TH> custom TH> or TH> verbatim TH> It's just that I feel we have not paid close enough attention to the TH> naming of things in

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

Is freetext all right with everyone, or should we use something like literal custom or verbatim It's just that I feel we have not paid close enough attention to the naming of things in the past, and we might want "measure twice" before we document this. -- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fair

Re: Freetext attribute for all tags...

Hello Arron, I add such attribute to the tags - Button Cancel Checkbox File Hidden Image Img Link Multibox Password Radio Reset Select Submit Textarea Text Now all non supported by struts attributes can be added to the target tag via 'freetext' attribute. This attribute contents will directly r

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc struts-html.xml

oalexeev01/12/10 02:06:27 Modified:doc struts-html.xml Log: Add freetext attribute to directly render all non supported by struts attributes to the target tags. Revision ChangesPath 1.26 +197 -0jakarta-struts/doc/struts-html.xml Index: struts-html.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html BaseFieldTag.java BaseHandlerTag.java ButtonTag.java CancelTag.java CheckboxTag.java ImageTag.java ImgTag.java LinkTag.java MultiboxTag.java RadioTag.java ResetTag.java SelectTag.java SubmitTag.java TextareaTag.java

oalexeev01/12/10 02:05:51 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html BaseFieldTag.java BaseHandlerTag.java ButtonTag.java CancelTag.java CheckboxTag.java ImageTag.java ImgTag.java LinkTag.java MultiboxTag.java