DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10238] New: - Javascript Interpreter in IE6 cannot submit forms built with Struts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10239] New: - Strange Bug in PropertyUtils, getter not found but exist in form class

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10238] - Javascript Interpreter in IE6 cannot submit forms built with Struts

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9594] - html:submit without property attribute causes JavaScript error with form[...].submit();

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9594] - html:submit without property attribute causes JavaScript error with form[...].submit();

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Tiles And Struts

> Note that Struts1.1 also require the TilesRequestProcessor to enable Tiles. In practice, I find that if you only use a * single * Tiles definition file (no comma-delimited list), then the stock 1.1 ActionServlet seems to work just as well. This works with the Tiles example application as well

New Tag

Hey James H., Are you aware of any stylesheet tags in the core? One that will render a simple: from something like this: To my knowledge there aren't any. I wrote my own last year, and I'd like to submit it if there's not a similar one. It's 50 lines (including comments, but not license)

Re: Tiles And Struts

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:48:55 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Tiles And Struts > > > Note that Struts1.1 also require

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10257] New: - WriteTag : bundle & localeKey incorrectly set to null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10257] - WriteTag : bundle & localeKey incorrectly set to null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: New Tag

I'm not aware of anything that accomplishes what you're looking for, however, I've never gone looking for it either :) I would try looking at the JSTL stuff. Struts is headed that way. -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ --- James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > H

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10257] - WriteTag : bundle & localeKey incorrectly set to null

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: New Tag

Why not just replace: with: I think this is a better way because then you can specify a global-forward in strut-config and use "rewrite forward" if you want to allow someone to change at any time (site-wide). Also, what about this stylesheet syntax: @import url(Re: Tiles And Struts

2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes

While we're on the subject of Struts and Tiles can someone, with privilege to do so, add the Tiles dtd to the jakarta.apache.org/dtds/ directory. This is being referenced in the config files, but it returns a 403 forbidden when you try to access it. http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/dtds/tiles-co

Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in 1.1, and improve the existing documentation, with a goal to release a beta 2 of Strust 1.1 in the near future (ideally by July 8 or so). Part of my motivation for the timing is that Sun is shutting down next week, so I will have some quality tim

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes

+1 and more than happy to help with bugs and docs. -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in > 1.1, and improve the > existing documentation, with a goal to release a > be

Re: Tiles And Struts

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:02:52 -0700 (PDT) > From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Tiles And Struts > > While we're on the subject

cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

2002-06-26 Thread craigmcc

craigmcc2002/06/26 11:25:51 Modified:.build.xml Log: Update interim version number to 1.1-b2-dev (instead of 1.1-b1). Revision ChangesPath 1.73 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/build.xml Index: build.xml ==

Re: Tiles And Struts

2002-06-26 Thread Matt Raible

It's a miracle! ;) Thanks for doing this, now I can use XMLSpy to validate my tiles definitions. Matt --- "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:02:52 -0700 (PDT) > > From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action RequestProcessor.java

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 11:49:17 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action RequestProcessor.java Log: Patch for Bug 8792 Submitted by Jens Viebig & Yannic Lamothe to fix. May have to undo if it gives Tomcat 3.3 users problems ??? java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.str

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Martin Cooper

+1 on Beta 2 soon (although my company isn't shutting down next week :). +1 also on reviewing the tags. I fixed one or two of these a while ago - they showed up after I started using Resin 2.x - but there are likely more that I didn't stumble across. A systematic review would be good. Related to

Re: multipart requests + forwarding = bug

2002-06-26 Thread Rob Leland

Thanks, I did as you suggested ad added th patch to processActionForward() instead of doForward(). After submitting this I noticed that James Holmes was also working actively on this bug. -Rob Hal Deadman wrote: >The subject of this email doesn't seem to match the body but if you are >referrin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly (was Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] - RequestProcessor doesn't uncast the Request properly (was Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: multipart requests + forwarding = bug

2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes

All yours. I was just checking the patch that Joe sent in. -james [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/ --- Rob Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks, I did as you suggested ad added th patch to > processActionForward() > instead of doForward(). After submitting this I > no

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9377] - generates absolute URLs - should be relative?

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

bug 4776

2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes

Before I commit the patch for this bug I wanted to see what the group thinks about changing the functionality of this method. Are we going to be "breaking" any code anywhere? I don't think we will, but just wanted to run it up the flag pole first. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:49:49 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > +1 on Beta 2 soon (alt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9377] - generates absolute URLs - should be relative?

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9377] - generates absolute URLs - should be relative?

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Fwd: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9377] - generates absolute URLs - should be relative?

2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes

Note: forwarded message attached. __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com --- Begin Message --- +1 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9377] - generates absolute URLs - should be relative?

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/doc-files - New directory

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 13:47:06 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/doc-files - New directory -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/tiles UseAttributeTei.java

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 13:58:09 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/tiles UseAttributeTei.java Log: remove double ;; Stupid UML parser chokes otherwise Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -4 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tagli

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/xmlDefinition I18nFactorySet.java

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 13:58:19 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles/xmlDefinition I18nFactorySet.java Log: remove double ;; Stupid UML parser chokes otherwise Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -4 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action/doc-files actionUML.jpg

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 14:54:03 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action/doc-files actionUML.jpg Added: src/share/org/apache/struts/action package.html Log: Add mising package.html so the UML diagrams that have been here for ages can be seen. Revision ChangesPath

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util package.html

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 15:28:05 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/util package.html Log: I assume since no one has objected the Bean description can remain here. Revision ChangesPath 1.8 +0 -1 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/util/package.html

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator/doc-files validatorUML.jpg validator_1UML.jpg validator_2UML.jpg

2002-06-26 Thread rleland

rleland 2002/06/26 15:32:32 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/actions/doc-files actionsUML.jpg src/share/org/apache/struts/config package.html src/share/org/apache/struts/config/doc-files configUML.jpg src/share/org/apache/struts/upload/do

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10263] New: - logic.location message missing for logic tags LocalStrings

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10263] - logic.location message missing for logic tags LocalStrings

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Rob Leland

Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > >Are the other committers interested in working towards such a goal? > +1, I'll try to finish up the UML for classes. and put in place holders for the added package descriptions. Plus pitch in else where. -Rob -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Martin Cooper

> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:45 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:49:49 -0700 >

[Bug 5887] New: - Forte hangs, reports: The Tomcat Server is not running correctly with Struts-using apps

2002-06-26 Thread Russell, Joe (INV-EDH)

Has this problem been resolved? I'm getting the same error running Tomcat Server with NetBeans, trying to access the struts-example. Am using current j2sdk1.4.0_01. Look like problem with Tomcat or Struts. Thanks, Joe Russell Sr. Software Engineer DST Innovis R&D Center 916-939-6112 [EMAIL PRO

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes.xml release-notes-1.1-b1.xml

2002-06-26 Thread husted

husted 2002/06/26 16:36:11 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml release-notes-1.1-b1.xml Log: Restore release notes from 1.1 beta 1 and move yesterday's changes into the nightly build release notes instead (oops). Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +204 -31 jakarta-s

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/artimus/pages/article Form.jsp Menu.jsp

2002-06-26 Thread jholmes

jholmes 2002/06/26 16:38:52 Modified:contrib/artimus/pages/article Form.jsp Menu.jsp Log: Fix contrib/artimus JSPs so that they are well formed HTML/JSP PR: Bugzilla #9617 Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -2 jakarta-struts/contrib/artimus/pages/article/Form.js

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/artimus/pages/wizard Form.jsp Relay.jsp View.jsp

2002-06-26 Thread jholmes

jholmes 2002/06/26 16:39:21 Modified:contrib/artimus/pages/wizard Form.jsp Relay.jsp View.jsp Log: Fix contrib/artimus JSPs so that they are well formed HTML/JSP PR: Bugzilla #9617 Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +3 -3 jakarta-struts/contrib/artimus/pages/wizard

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9617] - [PATCH] Fix contrib/artimus JSPs so that they are well formed HTML/JSP

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > > -Original Me

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/logic LocalStrings.properties

2002-06-26 Thread jholmes

jholmes 2002/06/26 16:44:30 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/logic LocalStrings.properties Log: logic.location message missing for logic tags LocalStrings PR: Bugzilla #10263 Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -0 jakarta-strut

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10263] - logic.location message missing for logic tags LocalStrings

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Ted Husted

For the docs, do you think it might be useful to add a new 1.1 section and march through the new features there, rather than patch the 1.0 docs? A 1.1 section might be easier to create, since we won't have to worry about segues, and will do double-duty as an upgraders guide. Of course, we could s

1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy

2002-06-26 Thread James Holmes

Was just updating some code in Struts Console and noticed that the element doesn't allow for child elements. This seems to be an oversight to me as every other major element has this. Shouldn't users be able to set properties on those classes too? I think so. I'll fix the DTD and related fil

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html package.html

2002-06-26 Thread jholmes

jholmes 2002/06/26 18:32:46 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html package.html Log: remove remnants from a merge conflict in the past Revision ChangesPath 1.14 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/package.html Index: pac

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Martin Cooper

> -Original Message- > From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:44 PM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0700 >

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:44:48 -0400 > From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > For

Re: 1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT) > From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy > > Was just updating some code in Struts Con

Re: 1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT) > From: James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: 1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy > > Was just updating some code in Struts Con

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

See intermixed. On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 18:39:04 -0700 > From: Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Struts Developers List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > > -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10268] New: - Sub-apps need context-relative option for 'input' of an Action

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_b

jsp - servlet - struts - internationalization

2002-06-26 Thread Chakradhar Tallam

hi, is there any good tutorial available (for best practices etc.,) for internationalization of jsp applications. please forward me few pointers. chaks.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7663] - File Upload example throws exception when run in JBoss 3.0

2002-06-26 Thread bugzilla

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Arron Bates

> > If the tag implementation (not including release()) modifies the values of > > properties, then yes, we're in big trouble. This is the case I've come > > across before. > > > > I thought we had caught all of those, but want to make very sure. > > For example, if the second use of a tag sets

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Arron Bates

> > Meanwhile, I've set up a "diff" section in the release notes with > > pointers to every thing with 1.1 features or deprecations, that could > > then be used to help create the 1.1 doc section. > > > > http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/userGuide/release-notes.html#diff > > > > AFAIK, the JavaDoc

Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2

2002-06-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan

On 27 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote: > Date: 27 Jun 2002 14:33:11 +1000 > From: Arron Bates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2 > > > > Meanwhile, I've set up a "diff" se