DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10217.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7606.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
be carefull because the html isn't xml but sgml.
Your packages names can confused newbies.
It would be better to do somethink like :
org.apache.struts.taglib.commons
org.apache.struts.taglib.xhtml
org.apache.struts.taglib.html
org.apache.struts.taglib.wml
...
It's only my opinion and I'm not a
cedric 2002/07/15 05:51:52
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/tiles
ComponentDefinitionsFactory.java
Log:
Add deprecated javadoc tag.
Now we must use the plugin.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -3
Tim--
Thanks for volunteering to tackle this.
Unfortunately, someone has already beaten you to the
punch. Follow this link for details:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5518
If you'd like to jump in and help out I would
recommend going into bugzilla and tackling some bugs.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10584.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7352.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10537.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10010.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm having a conversation with David Winterfeldt regarding how the
validator works, specifically with Struts. He suggested I raise the
question here for more input.
If I have three fields, defined:
field property=lastNamedepends=required
arg0
The Validator was designed to work this way so there
could different groupings of validation rules.
Because some times it may not make sense to continue
with certain validations until the form is in a
certain state. The depends attribute in the pluggable
validator definitions is what controls
Declarative exception handling is a very welcome feature in struts b1, but
it receives very little comments. I put my little thought here and hope it will
help when b2 is coming out:
1. The 'scope' attribute in ExceptionConfig is possibly redundant.
According the current API doc, the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10842.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At 03:57 PM 7/15/2002, David Winterfeldt wrote:
The Validator was designed to work this way so there
could different groupings of validation rules.
Because some times it may not make sense to continue
with certain validations until the form is in a
certain state. The depends attribute in the
--- RequestProcessor.java.orig Mon Jul 15 14:26:05 2002
+++ RequestProcessor.java Mon Jul 15 14:26:56 2002
@@ -397,7 +397,13 @@
response.sendRedirect
(response.encodeRedirectURL(request.getContextPath() +
uri));
} else {
-doForward(uri,
Hi all,
I'm working on a servlet that was subclassed from ActionServlet 1.0, and
trying to port it to 1.1. I have most of the ActionServlet subclass
reformulated as a subclass of RequestProcessor with the goal that the
ActionServlet would not be impacted by the addition of this code. In
jholmes 2002/07/15 15:06:36
Modified:doc/proposals todo-1.1.xml
Log:
remove reference to Tiles and Validator in the contrib folder
since they've been folded into the core.
this page seems to be very out of date and needs attention.
PR: Bugzilla #7352
Revision
I just looked at the code and it looks like I broke
backwards compatibility when I added the methods that
return objects instead of boolean values. The
validateDate method used to default to true and only
validate the field if it wasn't blank or null. So if
the field was blank, date validation
jholmes 2002/07/15 15:13:23
Modified:doc/resources extensions.xml
Log:
remove Tiles and Validator as being extensions since there in the core now
PR: Bugzilla #7352
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +0 -2 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/extensions.xml
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10010.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This sounds like an enhancement to me.
Anybody else??
-james
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesholmes.com/struts/
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE
AT
jholmes 2002/07/15 15:32:34
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
remove 7352
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +1 -2 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/STATUS,v
thanks - the problem is ofcourse that previous editions of dw are nto
supported, so I think I will still go ahead with this for dw3 and dw4 people
and I will use this when we get around for buring ultradev. Thanks for the
tip - I will talk to the taglibs/ project when its closer to finishing.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brian Topping wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:03:52 -0400
From: Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: initConfigDigester refactoring?
Hi all,
I'm working on a servlet that was subclassed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10842.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At 06:08 PM 7/15/2002, you wrote:
I just looked at the code and it looks like I broke
backwards compatibility when I added the methods that
return objects instead of boolean values. The
validateDate method used to default to true and only
validate the field if it wasn't blank or null. So if
the
Just took a second thought at this, and realized that you're right in the sense
that even with my code in place, you need to make them boolean because
otherwise optional dates would fail validation (and optional credit cards, and
any other typed value)
+1 to backing back out to booleans. There
jholmes 2002/07/15 16:42:34
Removed: contrib/validator/dist
ApplicationResources.properties.sample
struts-validator.tld validator-rules.xml
Log:
removing old Validator files
PR: Bugzilla #7347
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jholmes 2002/07/15 16:46:21
Removed: contrib/validator/docs contact.html index.html
installation.html jsptags.html overview.html
revision.html todolist.html
Log:
removing old Validator files
PR: Bugzilla #7347
--
To unsubscribe,
jholmes 2002/07/15 16:48:07
Removed: contrib/validator/docs/css main_style.css
Log:
removing old Validator files
PR: Bugzilla #7347
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jholmes 2002/07/15 16:50:24
Removed: contrib/validator/web/example changeLocale.jsp index.jsp
jsRegistration.jsp jsType.jsp
multiRegistration1.jsp multiRegistration2.jsp
registration.jsp staticJavascript.jsp
jholmes 2002/07/15 16:56:56
Removed: contrib/validator/src/example log4j.properties
contrib/validator/src/example/org/apache/struts/validator/example
ApplicationResources.properties
ApplicationResources_fr.properties
jholmes 2002/07/15 17:00:12
Removed: contrib/validator INSTALL LICENSE README
build.properties.sample build.xml
Log:
removing old Validator files
PR: Bugzilla #7347
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
jholmes 2002/07/15 17:03:41
Modified:contrib README
Log:
make note about Validator being moved to commons and linked into Struts via the core
PR: Bugzilla #7347
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -0 jakarta-struts/contrib/README
Index: README
jholmes 2002/07/15 17:05:27
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
remove 7347
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +0 -1 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file: /home/cvs/jakarta-struts/STATUS,v
I closed out bug 7347 tonight, which was for removing
Validator from the contrib directory. I think it
makes sense to do this for Tiles as well. It can be
confusing for anyone new to the project to see what
appears to be a duplication of code.
I know we're still working the kinks out of the
jholmes 2002/07/15 19:21:41
Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml
Log:
updated to use isNaN(value) instead of !value for validFloat() function
PR: Bugzilla 9051
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9051.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jholmes 2002/07/15 19:37:56
Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml
Log:
updated remaining !iValue references to be isNaN(iValue)
PR: Bugzilla #7351, #8446
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +4 -4 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml
Index:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8446.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
jholmes 2002/07/15 19:42:55
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
close out 7351 and 8446
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +2 -4 jakarta-struts/STATUS
Index: STATUS
===
RCS file:
martinc 2002/07/15 21:56:42
Modified:src/exercise-taglib/org/apache/struts/webapp/exercise
ApplicationResources.properties
web/exercise-taglib index.jsp
web/exercise-taglib/WEB-INF struts-config.xml
Added:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10520.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
46 matches
Mail list logo
