DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14331.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
husted 2002/11/07 00:47:33
Modified:doc using.xml status.xml index.xml
Log:
Subdivide home page; create subdirectory for news.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -5 jakarta-struts/doc/using.xml
Index: using.xml
husted 2002/11/07 00:48:01
Modified:doc/resources extensions.xml articles.xml
Log:
Updates news and resources.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +5 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/extensions.xml
Index: extensions.xml
husted 2002/11/07 00:48:11
Modified:doc/news index.xml
Log:
Updates news and resources.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +229 -3jakarta-struts/doc/news/index.xml
Index: index.xml
===
RCS file:
husted 2002/11/07 00:48:50
Removed: doc news_2002_q2.xml news_2002_q1.xml news_2002.xml
news_2001.xml
Log:
Remove obsolete files (moved to news directory)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional
Hello List,
I am new here so excuse me if the issue has been already discussed. I
am using Struts1.0.2
I have a probelm with the way the struts handles the multipart message
when the multipart request contains non-ISO-8859-1 characterset (or its
subset like US-ASCII).
I guess the issue about
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
husted 2002/11/07 05:03:50
Modified:doc/news index.xml
Log:
Updates.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +149 -4jakarta-struts/doc/news/index.xml
Index: index.xml
===
RCS file:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14259.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Not sure if you caught the thread on the users list, or the bug recently
posted by Kjeld Froberg:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332
Here's the proposed code change:
RequestUtils.java
---
From:
public static Class
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
See comments enclosed
James Mitchell wrote:
Not sure if you caught the thread on the users list, or the bug recently
posted by Kjeld Froberg:
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332
Here's the proposed code change:
RequestUtils.java
husted 2002/11/07 08:53:55
Modified:doc/resources articles.xml extensions.xml guis.xml index.xml
Log:
Routine updates (still catching up).
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +4 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/articles.xml
Index: articles.xml
husted 2002/11/07 08:53:43
Modified:doc/news index.xml
Log:
Routine updates (still catching up).
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +71 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/news/index.xml
Index: index.xml
===
RCS
husted 2002/11/07 08:54:01
Modified:doc/resources views.xml
Log:
Routine updates (still catching up).
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +4 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/views.xml
Index: views.xml
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Rob Leland wrote:
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 01:20:24 -0500
From: Rob Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Action.java Globals.java questions.
Ted Husted wrote:
Do we have
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 10:53 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Action.java Globals.java questions.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Rob Leland wrote:
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2002 01:20:24 -0500
As a general principle, J2EE 1.4 (and later) requires app servers to make
the webapp's class loader available via the getContextClassLoader() call.
This feature is already supported by nearly every other server in the
world. Therefore, I'd really recommend that the TriFork folks upgrade
their
Absolutely, I never intended to commit unless I had buy-in from everyone.
I don't claim to understand the full impact of this, so your comments as
well as Roberts are always welcome.
By reverting the code (my local copy anyway) back to its original:
test.junit == SUCCESSFUL Total time:
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, James Mitchell wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 12:51:22 -0500
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vote] Modify classloading in RequestUtils
Absolutely, I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14366.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
hi Cedric,
I tried to query bugzilla but could not find bug #. So I opened bug # 14366
for this issue.
please let me know if you need any more details.
Thanks!
Anand Joshi
Websphere Development Team
Ph: 919-254-4331 (Tie 444-4331)
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2? It's not like they have to pay to upgrade
to 4.1.12. Maybe this isn't such a big deal.
Dave
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vote]
11/7/2002 2:10:41 PM, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2? It's not like they have to pay
to upgrade to 4.1.12. Maybe this isn't such a big deal.
chuckle/
Don't go there David =:0)
-Ted.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I think this is starting to sound like a job for 1.2.x =:0)
-Ted.
11/7/2002 1:43:17 PM, Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Personally, I would feel a lot better if we could try the
modified version on lots of different servers (in addition to
Tomcat), and with struts.jar either
3.2 isn't even a current release is it? Shouldn't we reserve such a
change for compliance with *current* implementations (of the 3.x series
- ie TC 3.3-series)?
Is there some valid reason, of which I am unaware, that would make it
difficult for folks to upgrade? Is there some drawback to
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vote] Modify classloading in RequestUtils
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2?
For what it's worth, I believe we agreed, prior to
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted;apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: RE: [Vote] Modify classloading in RequestUtils
I think this is starting to sound like a job for 1.2.x =:0)
I think you might be
Martin Cooper wrote:
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:dgraham1980;hotmail.com]
Subject: RE: [Vote] Modify classloading in RequestUtils
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2?
For what it's worth, I believe we agreed, prior to the release of 1.1-b2, to
drop support for Tomcat
I think its important to keep in mind that we don't support
containers, we support specifications. In practice, we sometimes
make allowances for certain containers, so long as they are not
too far out of spec. In the past, Struts has generated a few
service packs to bring containers into
+1
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted;apache.org]
Sent:
Ted Husted wrote:
I think its important to keep in mind that we don't support
containers, we support specifications. In practice, we sometimes
make allowances for certain containers, so long as they are not
too far out of spec. In the past, Struts has generated a few
service packs to bring
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
It seems that this is related with
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13686
a similar issue with iplanet
A Dijous 07 Novembre 2002 17:13, James Mitchell va escriure:
Not sure if you caught the thread on the users list, or the bug recently
posted by Kjeld Froberg:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I know this is out of topic for this list, but is a common problem for
us all. I am using Log4J in my Struts app, and I need to use a component
encapsulated in a JAR file that uses Log4J too. How is the best way to
configure the Singleton Logger? I need to configure my loggers and the
RODRIGO CARVALHO DOS SANTOS wrote:
I know this is out of topic for this list, but is a common problem for
us all. I am using Log4J in my Struts app, and I need to use a component
encapsulated in a JAR file that uses Log4J too. How is the best way to
configure the Singleton Logger?
Have you
David Graham wrote:
Do people still use Tomcat 3.2? It's not like they have to pay to
upgrade to 4.1.12. Maybe this isn't such a big deal.
I agree that support for TC 3.2 isn't a big deal since we still have
Struts 1.0.2 which does run on TC 3.2 right ?
I have experience with SOME deployed
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13686.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14332.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes, it is the same.
Thank you.
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
-Original Message-
From: Antoni Reus
rleland 2002/11/07 21:39:25
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action Action.java
ActionServlet.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/actions SwitchAction.java
src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html FormTag.java
rleland 2002/11/07 21:45:58
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html
JavascriptValidatorTag.java
Log:
Bug 14054
Checked in More ApplicationConfig-ModuleConfig
Revision ChangesPath
1.13 +3 -3
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14380.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
47 matches
Mail list logo
