RE: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread PILGRIM, Peter, FM
-Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] As we've discussed a couple of times, the last major functionality change we had discussed for Struts 1.1 was to migrate to dependence on commons-resources, rather than the proprietary message resource

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16019] New: - LookupDispatchAction multiple MessageResources

2003-01-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16019] - LookupDispatchAction multiple MessageResources

2003-01-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16019] - LookupDispatchAction multiple MessageResources

2003-01-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread James Mitchell
The ResourceFactory implementation. Would it affect how the messages are retrieved? For example if you have a merged resources that does the following DBResources (1) Boot strap read properties from a flat file (2) Reads some JDBC properties from (1) if any

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16019] - LookupDispatchAction multiple MessageResources

2003-01-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16019] - LookupDispatchAction multiple MessageResources

2003-01-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16019. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Passing parameters with mapping.findforward

2003-01-13 Thread Rajendra Yadav
Hi All, How do we pass parameters from one jsp to another using the Struts framework. By using the mapping.findForward(), we only redirect it to a particular jsp but I am not able to see how to pass parameters. Thanks for the help. - Raj - Do you Yahoo!?

RE: Passing parameters with mapping.findforward

2003-01-13 Thread Nelson, Laird
-Original Message- From: Rajendra Yadav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How do we pass parameters from one jsp to another using the Struts framework. Nothing to do with Struts. See the Servlet API. http://java.sun.com/j2ee/sdk_1.3/techdocs/api/javax/servlet/ServletRequest.h

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread David Graham
Are there any backwards compatibility problems here? Because the Struts classes use protected MessageResources members they are exposed to classes extending the framework. It seems that changing these to Messages objects would break existing extensions. Dave From: Craig R. McClanahan

Requested modification of InsertTag.java

2003-01-13 Thread Jay
Requested modification of tiles/InsertTag.java I appreciate your ExceptionHandler concept and use it for capturing critical errors, thoroughly logging both error and context information and forwarding to a special web page that displays very concise information about the error (error reference

RE: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, PILGRIM, Peter, FM wrote: The ResourceFactory implementation. Would it affect how the messages are retrieved? Yes, since it is the Resources implementation that actually does the retrieval :-). For example if you have a merged resources that does the following

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 07:52:52 -0700 From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources Are there any backwards

Validator and multiple message resources

2003-01-13 Thread franco . caponi
I have see that arg* tag on validator descriptors TLD did not support the bundle property but only the key property... it is correct or i have old descriptors? If true, this feature will be included in Struts 1.1? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
Can we also migrate the Message carrier [o.a.s.a.ActionMessages] and Message element [o.a.s.a.ActionMessages] to Commons Resources? The idea being a domain logic object may like to return a collection of Messages to the presentation tier. (At least mine would!) I'm thinking someone should be

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread David Graham
ActionMessages doesn't make sense outside of Struts. It would need a new name at the least. If we move them to commons, they should become interfaces with some default implementations. Then people would be free to plugin their own implementation. I think they're fine staying in Struts for

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Ted Husted
I am using them outside of Struts now, and it makes perfect sense =:0) It's important to remember that the idea of a message resource is generic to an application and is not a Struts concept. If something occurs on the domain layer, the enterprise application should be able to return the

RE: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Edgar P. Dollin
I like the idea. While your at it, can each message pass in its own resource bundle so you can keep the resources with the Class/Package? Edgar -Original Message- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 6:15 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re:

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread David Graham
I agree with you. I was mainly talking about the name ActionMessages. I think there's a more generic name that doesn't seem to be so Struts specific. David From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16048] New: - Example page won't compile under jboss

2003-01-13 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16048. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Passing parameters with mapping.findforward

2003-01-13 Thread Rajendra Yadav
Can we pass objects using the struts framework ? Nelson, Laird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Rajendra Yadav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] How do we pass parameters from one jsp to another using the Struts framework. Nothing to do with Struts. See the Servlet API.

RE: Passing parameters with mapping.findforward

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Cooper
This question is really a question for the struts-user list, and not the struts-dev list. In any case, the answer to your question is documented at the link Laird provided. -- Martin Cooper On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Rajendra Yadav wrote: Can we pass objects using the struts framework ? Nelson,

Re: Requested modification of InsertTag.java

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Cooper
Enhancement requests should be posted to the bug database, as described here: http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/using.html#Bugs That will make sure it doesn't get lost, and will be addressed at some point. -- Martin Cooper On 13 Jan 2003, Jay wrote: Requested modification of

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Cooper
I'm +1 on the principle of going for the whole enchilada. I haven't had a chance to look over the latest changes to Commons Resources yet, but I'm a committer on Resources, so I can always fix any problems I see. ;-) And you can count me in as a volunteer willing to help maintain it (and +1 the

Re: [Proposal] Migrate to Dependency on commons-resources

2003-01-13 Thread Martin Cooper
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Ted Husted wrote: Can we also migrate the Message carrier [o.a.s.a.ActionMessages] and Message element [o.a.s.a.ActionMessages] to Commons Resources? +1 The idea being a domain logic object may like to return a collection of Messages to the presentation tier. (At