Re: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with FileUpload Beta 2

2003-05-31 Thread Arron Bates
> Struts is a product of the Apache Software Foundation... > > [cut] > > ...we can learn from our mistakes and cut a release > whenever we add a feature that people can put to good use (instead of > after we have added a large set of new features). > > -Ted. Couldn't agree more (hence my +1),

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/test/org/apache/struts/tiles TestTilesPlugin.java

2003-05-31 Thread jmitchell
jmitchell2003/05/30 17:10:38 Modified:src/test/org/apache/struts/taglib SimpleBeanForTesting.java src/test/org/apache/struts/taglib/html TestCheckboxTag1.java src/test/org/apache/struts/tiles TestTilesPlugin.java Log: -remove 1 unused import -fix incor

Re: composable RequestProcessor

2003-05-31 Thread Ted Husted
A good place to post these suggestions would be the wikiPage: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?RequestProcessor -Ted. Kris Schneider wrote: RequestHandler? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additi

Re: composable RequestProcessor

2003-05-31 Thread Kris Schneider
RequestHandler? Quoting David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That doesn't fit well with method parameter semantics because it's not a > noun. You can't say, "I'm passing a RequestProcessing to myMethod". > > David > > > >From: "Andrew Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[FRIDAY] Re: composable RequestProcessor

2003-05-31 Thread ernest . argetsinger
How about HarryTuttle? Harry Tuttle: Bloody paperwork. Huh! Sam Lowry: I suppose one has to expect a certain amount. Harry Tuttle: Why? I came into this game for the action, the excitement. Go anywhere, travel light, get in, get out, wherever there's trouble, a man alone. Now they got the whol

Re: composable RequestProcessor

2003-05-31 Thread David Graham
That doesn't fit well with method parameter semantics because it's not a noun. You can't say, "I'm passing a RequestProcessing to myMethod". David From: "Andrew Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: composable Requ

Re: composable RequestProcessor

2003-05-31 Thread Andrew Harris
RequestProcessing? Andrew Harris On 30 May 2003 at 7:39, David Graham wrote: > >In the 1.x series, we could do something like declare a > >RequestProcessorInterface, have the existing concrete classes implement > >that, and then change the underlying code to use interface instead, and > >avo

Re: composable RequestProcessor

2003-05-31 Thread Matthias Bauer
;-) Ok, I will do that next week or so. --- Matthias Ted Husted wrote: Matthias Bauer wrote: > Sounds good. Would you take care of the enhancement ticket, Ted? Nope. =:0) You and Joe brought it up, so you or Joe should post the ticket. (We call that "community-building" =:>) --

Re: VOTE (enough already!): Release Struts RC2 with FileUpload Beta2

2003-05-31 Thread Ted Husted
Arron Bates wrote: Somehow in all this I get the nagging feeling that Struts now has an agenda which it's never had before. It was just cutting quality software, hang the time it took. Struts is a product of the Apache Software Foundation and follows the ASF agenda. The ASF exists to build *commun

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20356] - Provide a "RequestProcessor" interface

2003-05-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20356] New: - Provide a "RequestProcessor" interface

2003-05-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu