RE: A Custom tag using and validation ...

Hi, I think Struts should be as flexible/extensible as is possible/practical. With that in mind, and after reading about this enhancement I have the following concerns: 1) Putting an '*' into a label for required fields assumes people want an '*', maybe they want a '(R)' or maybe they want somet

Re: A Custom tag using and validation ...

> Even if its not added to Struts (and there is a reason not to - it > relies on naming conventions FormName.fieldName - which seem reasonable > > to me, but aren't mandated by Struts), its all yours to use. It makes > sense to put it in some kind of sandbox or "goodies"/contrib area of >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18015] - New custom tag to write forms' properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/conf/share validator-rules.xml

dgraham 2003/06/24 19:10:35 Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml Log: Change javascript min length validation to match the server side checks. The server considered all whitespace to be a passing condition but the javascript would fail because it wasn't trimming the value bef

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/validator FieldChecks.java

dgraham 2003/06/24 18:32:31 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/validator FieldChecks.java Log: The max length javascript validation considers whitespace as a character. The server side max length check does *not* consider whitespace when comparing the number of characters to

Re: A Custom tag using and validation ...

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 09:16 PM, Ranjangaonkar, Vaibhav (HQP) wrote: Thanks for the response, Yes, your implementation looks Better than mine and the idea of turning 'fields in error red' is also nice, that's what I wanted to know if there Is already anything like this going, Hope this ta

RE: A Custom tag using and validation ...

Hi Erik, Thanks for the response, Yes, your implementation looks Better than mine and the idea of turning 'fields in error red' is also nice, that's what I wanted to know if there Is already anything like this going, Hope this tag is added to Struts soon. Also, just a query, Does your tag exte

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/conf/share validator-rules.xml

dgraham 2003/06/24 18:08:13 Modified:conf/share validator-rules.xml Log: Trim whitespace before checking length in validateRequired. PR# 21051. Revision ChangesPath 1.32 +9 -2 jakarta-struts/conf/share/validator-rules.xml Index: validator-rules.xml =

Re: A Custom tag using and validation ...

p.s. I'm presenting my tag at TheServerSide Symposium this Friday for any of you that will be there. http://www.theserverside.com/symposium Erik On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 05:52 PM, Ranjangaonkar, Vaibhav (HQP) wrote: Hi all, I have written a custom tag by extending MessageTag from ta

Re: A Custom tag using and validation ...

I wrote a tag that will do the '*' thing, and also turn the fields a different color if they are in error, along with a few other goodies. There is an open issue for something similar to be added to the Struts codebase here: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18015 See the link

A Custom tag using and validation ...

Hi all, I have written a custom tag by extending MessageTag from taglib.bean to display a * after a label. This * should be displayed after the label if the corresponding property is specified as 'required' in validation.xml Example : I can post the code if needed, just wanted to know

Re: A Question about Patches

On Tuesday 24 June 2003 13:46, DeRose Jonathan wrote: > I have a question about a patch I submitted, > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 > > A quick summary for anyone who may have missed it: > The enhancement provides lots of new functionality for error handling > beyond wr

A Question about Patches

I have a question about a patch I submitted, http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20784 A quick summary for anyone who may have missed it: The enhancement provides lots of new functionality for error handling beyond writing out the errors. (Developers could use it to highlight error

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21056] - tiles and i18n problem

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21056] New: - tiles and i18n problem

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Form bean population for and tags

Hello Kamal, Did you ever get a fix for this problem? - Malcolm -Original Message- From: Kamalakar Thota [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 1:20 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Form bean population for and tags Hello folks, I have the following problem using

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

James Mitchell wrote: On Tuesday 24 June 2003 01:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: rleland 2003/06/23 22:45:13 Modified:.build.xml Log: Change version by adding '-post' to verify that gump is indeed using an old struts build.xml file not the current one. Revision ChangesPa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21051] - javascript required validator accepts fields containing only whitespace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21050] - redirect=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Any plans to support ?

At 7:22 AM -0700 6/24/03, Peter Eichenauer wrote: Hallo Devs, Are there any plans to support the longdesc attribute for image-tags? is in the Rec-html4 included. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#adef-longdesc-IMG I think the main question here is whether you need to suppor

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21051] New: - javascript required validator accepts fields containing only whitespace

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21050] New: - redirect=true

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16736] - focus script should check for disabled input field

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16736] - html:form Focus-Script should check for disabled input field

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21043] - javascript mask validator fails when field is disabled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Any plans to support ?

Hallo Devs, Are there any plans to support the longdesc attribute for image-tags? is in the Rec-html4 included. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/struct/objects.html#adef-longdesc-IMG Peter . _ Get your own *FREE* family web site

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts build.xml

On Tuesday 24 June 2003 01:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > rleland 2003/06/23 22:45:13 > > Modified:.build.xml > Log: > Change version by adding '-post' to verify that gump is indeed using > an old struts build.xml file not the current one. > > Revision ChangesPath >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21043] - javascript mask validator fails when field is disabled

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21043] New: - javascript mask validator fails when field is disabled (RC2)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[GUMP] Build Failure - jakarta-struts

ommons/beanutils/dist/commons-beanutils.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/collections/dist/commons-collections.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/digester/dist/commons-digester.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/jakarta-commons/fileupload/target/commons-fileupload-20030624.jar:/home/rubys/jakarta/j