Re: SuccessAction (was RE: Addition of two new actions)

2003-08-09 Thread Joe Germuska
At 16:51 -0700 8/8/03, David Graham wrote: I'd like to get your thoughts (and others) on my proposal at the beginning of this message. In short, we wouldn't use the parameter attribute nor would we define success as the only correct forward name. SuccessAction would forward to the first forward

[Fwd: Re: [Opensource] [Volunteer Call] Review Commons-Resources]

2003-08-09 Thread Peter A. Pilgrim
-- Peter Pilgrim __ _ _ _ / //__ // ___// ___/ + Serverside Java / /___/ // /__ / /__ + Struts / // ___// ___// ___/ + Expresso Committer __/ // /__ / /__ / /__ + Independent Contractor /___/////// +

Re: Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of twonew actions)

2003-08-09 Thread
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 01:34:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Steve Raeburn wrote:of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [X] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction -Rob -- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)

2003-08-09 Thread
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From:

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/action ExceptionHandler.java LocalStrings.properties

2003-08-09 Thread dgraham
dgraham 2003/08/06 17:39:05 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/action ExceptionHandler.java LocalStrings.properties Log: Log exception with a message to print the full stack trace for PR# 21569. Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +12 -4

Re: Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of twonew actions)

2003-08-09 Thread
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 01:34:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Steve Raeburn wrote:of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [X] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction -Rob -- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RE: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of two new actions)

2003-08-09 Thread
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 03:01:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Is this a vote? If so, shouldn't we have [VOTE] on the subject line?of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org 678.910.8017 AIM:jmitchtx -Original Message- From:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22219] - html:select tag doesn't assign default value properly

2003-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22219. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Re: Parameter/Mapping/ConfigDispatchAction (Was RE: Addition of twonew actions)

2003-08-09 Thread
ÔÚ 2003-08-09 01:34:00 ÄúдµÀ£º Steve Raeburn wrote:of you ? Could you tell me ? Thanks~~ I *think* we agreed to add this action. Pick a name. [ ] ParameterDispatchAction [X] MappingDispatchAction [ ] ConfigDispatchAction -Rob -- Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED]

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF struts-config-registration.xml struts-config.xml

2003-08-09 Thread rleland
rleland 2003/08/09 01:50:52 Modified:conf/share struts-config_1_2.dtd doc/userGuide release-notes.xml web/example/WEB-INF struts-config-registration.xml struts-config.xml Log: Add two new elements description-short and

RE: Struts Toolkit (was SuccessAction)

2003-08-09 Thread Steve Raeburn
I think the functionality that SuccessAction provides should be part of the core distribution, particularly as we're encouraging linking only to actions. This make it a whole lot easier. I'm sure there's a whole lot of things that can go into a toolkit, but would it be very different from

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22231] - the logic:present and bean:write will not display all of the HttpServletRequest attributes.

2003-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22231. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Building contrib packages WAS Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/tag-doc build.xml

2003-08-09 Thread Steve Raeburn
o.a.s.util.GenericDataSource is in the core and extends the legacy GenericDataSource so legacy needs to be built first. It is deprecated since 1.1. Can we get rid of all legacy / DataSource stuff for 1.2? Steve -Original Message- From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Resource Bundle Prototyping

2003-08-09 Thread Sgarlata Matt
Has there been any discussion of allowing resource bundles to inherit properties from other resource bundles? For the project I am working on, it would be nice if we had one resource bundle with application-level properties and also module-specific resource bundles which had all the properties

Re: When is the next release?

2003-08-09 Thread Ted Husted
Just a head's up. I'd like to draw up a Release Plan tomorrow for Struts 1.2 beta 1. I'd like to get this out so people can start migrating to the non-deprecated Struts 1.1+ (for lack of a better term) *before* we get into the Commons Resources thing. Since we did so much backward-compatiblity

html:form support for title attribute

2003-08-09 Thread Mike Janson
Hey there, New to the list, but it doesn't appear this has come up before after checking bugzilla and the archives--I've been working with UI folks who recently asked me how to add title attributes to FormTag, and sure enough, they should be there according to the 4.01 spec but they aren't.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22274] - Bizzare double-execution problem

2003-08-09 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22274. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.